Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> FWIW, I would like to see us work to eliminate all cyclic module
>>> dependencies in Guix, by splitting up our package modules as needed so
>>> that they form a directed acyclic graph.
>>
>> This seems hard to
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> modules separately. It seems to me that there are a large number of perl
> packages that haven't been updated in q
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2017-07-25 12:26 +0200) wrote:
>
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>>
> Now if one could pass a manifest or a system configuration to “guix
> weather” and it would show how many of the desired packages have
Hello,
Open MPI retains references to GCC, GFortran, etc., which significantly
increases its closure size.
The references come from cpp macros such as OMPI_FC_ABSOLUTE (absolute
file name of the Fortran compiler), defined in opal_config.h and
returned by command-line tools ‘ompi_info’ and ‘oshmem
Hi Julian,
Julian Graham skribis:
> From 36b7b5e5c06cf1950ae37f6798dd2b6f9453eae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julian Graham
> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 23:35:55 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.11.1.
>
> * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (gzochi): Update to 0.11.1.
> (gzoc
On July 27, 2017 12:03:50 PM GMT+03:00, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>Hi Efraim,
>
>Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
>> There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be
>better
>> to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
>> modules separately. It seems to me that ther
Alex Kost writes:
> Kyle Meyer (2017-07-25 21:40 -0400) wrote:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> Wait, isn't this what --pure is for? I haven't followed the
>>> discussion, but I would expect `guix environment` to *add* to my
>>> current profile, and use '--pure' if I want a "clean" environment
Alex Kost writes:
> Hi, I've noticed that "guix weather" provides "--manifest" long option
> but not "-m" short option (as "guix package" does). Would it be better
> to add "-m" for consistency with "guix package"?
Yes, that would be good. I forgot to provide it when I added
“--manifest” supp
Alex Kost writes:
> Feng Shu (2017-07-26 20:44 +0800) wrote:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> [...]
>>> The rest (setting up the symlink) is a little less convenient though.
>>> See (guix scripts package) or the equivalent Emacs-Guix code for how
>>> this works.
>>
>> (build-and-use-
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Open MPI retains references to GCC, GFortran, etc., which significantly
> increases its closure size.
My query about cycles from separating the lib output was from looking at
basically this. There should be a runtime package for compute nodes and
a developme
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Mes 0.9, representing 107
> commits over 5 weeks. Mescc now compiles to a surprisingly readable
> stage0 M1 macro assembler output format. Also, mescc can now compile a
> modified TinyCC into a running [mostly segfaulting] execu
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> > to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> > modules separately. It seems to me
Hey,
I noticed recently that there is a scheme client for Memcached [1], I
was looking at how this can be used with Guile, with the intention of
packaging it for Guix.
I've figured one was of getting access through Guile, which is to run
Guile with -x .sls, e.g.
→ GUILE_LOAD_PATH="." guile -x .s
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> > to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> > modules separately. It seems to me
On July 27, 2017 9:11:57 PM GMT+03:00, Leo Famulari wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi Efraim,
>>
>> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>>
>> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be
>better
>> > to revert the perl update and work on
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::*
> modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I
> think we should rather find a way to fix them (I spent a bit of time on
> it but the
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::*
> > modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I
> > think we shoul
That's very good news indeed! :)
I don't speak for the GNU Guix project itself, but here goes a
description on how I ended up being a package maker for GNU Guix:
For making package recipes, I mostly use knownledge about Scheme and
basics of build systems (no need to know each of the various build
18 matches
Mail list logo
