On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::* > > modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I > > think we should rather find a way to fix them (I spent a bit of time on > > it but then moved on to something else.) > > I've got the Date::* modules building with the attached patch series. > However, biber and biber-next fail their test suites. The last part of > the test suite:
biber-next passes its tests when updated to 2.7, the latest upstream version.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
