We can argue about this till we're blue in the face.
But on a pragmatic level, Mark's question demonstrates perfectly
that our current system is lacking. Other projects I work on
which have a more conventional approach do not suffer from this problem.
J'
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:56:56AM +0100
myglc2 (2016-12-21 19:18 -0500) wrote:
> On 12/17/2016 at 12:13 Alex Kost writes:
>
>> I have committed 'emacs-guix' package, so after "guix pull" or if you
>> use the git checkout, you may try it with:
>>
>> guix package -i emacs-guix
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Tried this on GuixSD 0.12.0 from git and I
Hi Guix,
this patch adds python-hdf4. I'm not sure if the line “Python-HDF4
is a fork of pyhdf.” in the description is necessary. The original
and “official” pyhdf (http://hdfeos.org/software/pyhdf.php) is
somewhat outdated (e.g. doesn't support python3).
Thomas
From 7bb5a32da7b2b7bd2a31b6
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:17:23AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> > gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.17.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.1.17.
>
> Unfortunately, this new version of gnupg consistently fails its test
> suite on every system we support except for x86_64:
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:17:23AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> > gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.17.
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.1.17.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this new version of gnupg consistently fails its test
>> suite on every system
On 12/22/2016 at 12:15 Alex Kost writes:
> myglc2 (2016-12-21 19:18 -0500) wrote:
>
>> Have you decided re feedback/support? github issues? mailing list?
>
> Whatever seems appropriate to you: issues or pull requests on
> github/notabug, or mailing me directly is OK. As for using guix-devel
> mai
Bake Timmons <65pan...@gmail.com> writes:
> * gnu/packages/web.scm (wwwoffle): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/web.scm | 28
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
Thanks for this! The patch looks good, but does not build on master
because the "libgcrypt" variable can
Thanks for the release, Ricardo!
Maxim
ng0 writes:
> [PATCH 1/3] gnu: gnurl: Update to 7.52.0 [fixes CVE.
>
> I'm aware of the warning the cURL maintainers posted and will make the gnurl
> release as soon as they release the version of cURL fixing whatever unknown
> security issue they have.
In my opinion, we can wait until I h
[PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add libmp4v2.
This package is pulled from code.google.com and I am trying to contact upstream
to check where the new canonical upstream location is.
[PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add tidy-html.
[PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add libsmf.
Those three above might need some further review, this is just to se
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (libextractor): Add dependencies:
tidy-html, libmp4v2, libsmf, bzip2.
[arguments](configure-flags): Add "--with-libtidy".
* Adjust the FIXME comment section accordingly.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
* gnu/packages/video.scm (libmp4v2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/video.scm | 49 -
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm
index 76b80b334..371031b03 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/v
* gnu/packages/music.scm (libsmf): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/music.scm | 49 +
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/music.scm b/gnu/packages/music.scm
index 079a07586..bba196eba 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/music.scm
+++ b/gn
* gnu/packages/web.scm (tidy-html): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/web.scm | 51 ++-
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/web.scm b/gnu/packages/web.scm
index 184869200..f28944c75 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/web.sc
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (libextractor): Move .a files to "static" output.
[arguments](phases): New phase for moving .a files to output "static".
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packa
On 2016-12-22 11:23, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Thanks for the release, Ricardo!
Echo :)
Glad to see more people doing releases.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Thomas Danckaert writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> this patch adds python-hdf4. I'm not sure if the line “Python-HDF4
> is a fork of pyhdf.” in the description is necessary. The original
> and “official” pyhdf (http://hdfeos.org/software/pyhdf.php) is
> somewhat outdated (e.g. doesn't support python3).
Hi Ludovic!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Does running “guix gc” help?
Yes; that's been my fix for now. Running the garbage collector purged 17
GB worth of data from the store.
> FWIW, on hydra.gnu.org we have this:
>
> On mirror.hydra.gnu.org:
>
> $ df -i /gnu/store
> Filesystem
Am 21.12.2016 um 17:38 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> For other tools we provide what upstream provides. For example, Qt
> comes with examples, which we provide in the ‘qt’ package (IIRC).
The php source package does not provide any example. I also searched the
internet for some hello-world-package,
Hello Tobias,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Maxim,
>
> On 21/12/16 22:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>>> What I don't understand is why the all the inodes are used at only 71%
>>> of disk usage (11GB left!). There's not much else than Guix there; I
>>> have a documents
[PATCH] gnu: Add toxic.
Problems: ncursesw is not found, and libnotify isn't found as well.
* gnu/packages/messaging.scm (toxic): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 47 ++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/messaging.scm b/gnu/packages/messaging.scm
index 4290a9f69..24728cc06 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/messag
On 12/18/2016 at 11:32 Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2016-12-15 18:39 +0100) wrote:
>>
[...]
>
>> I always feel uncomfortable to send patches or to push commits to the
>> Guix repo. I can't explain it properly, it's just painful all the
>> time;
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:33:19PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> We fixed this bug in our guile-irregex package in commit fb73f07a0fe,
>> but our chez-irregex and chicken packages are still vulnerable.
>
> Also note that (I believe) our chicken package is vulnerable to
> CV
>From 9a924507483674a3059b520b5e257304ebc97fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Reichoer
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:35:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: xonsh: Update to 0.5.0.
* gnu/packages/shells.scm (xonsh): Update to 0.5.0.
---
gnu/packages/shells.scm | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 inserti
Hi,
I would like to package httpstat.
It uses the MIT license:
https://github.com/reorx/httpstat/blob/master/LICENSE
However I didn't find MIT in licenses.scm.
Is there a compatible license?
Thanks,
Stefan.
Stefan,
On 22/12/16 23:17, Stefan Reichör wrote:
> However I didn't find MIT in licenses.scm.
The name ‘MIT licence’ is considered ambiguous by (amongst others) the
FSF[1]. This is probably the ‘expat’ licence, which you will find in
licenses.scm.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.
Stefan Reichör writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to package httpstat.
>
> It uses the MIT license:
> https://github.com/reorx/httpstat/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> However I didn't find MIT in licenses.scm.
>
> Is there a compatible license?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan.
Hi Stefan,
I believe the "expat" lice
Stefan Reichör writes:
> From 9a924507483674a3059b520b5e257304ebc97fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Reichoer
> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:35:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: xonsh: Update to 0.5.0.
>
> * gnu/packages/shells.scm (xonsh): Update to 0.5.0.
> ---
> gnu/packages/shells.scm
Hai,
On 22/12/16 23:23, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> This is probably the ‘expat’ licence, ...
On 22/12/16 23:29, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> I believe the "expat" license is the one you're looking for.
Ugh, are my mails missing the list again? :-/
(Sorry to go off topic, but I had similar troubles
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (toxic): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 47
> ++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/messaging.scm b/gnu/packages/messaging.scm
> index 4290a9f69..24728cc06 10
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Hai,
>
> On 22/12/16 23:23, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> This is probably the ‘expat’ licence, ...
>
> On 22/12/16 23:29, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> I believe the "expat" license is the one you're looking for.
>
> Ugh, are my mails missing the list again? :-/
>
No,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:24 AM, ludo-at-gnu.org |Guix-box| <
2wkutze...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> Scary, no? :-)
>
Haha, yes!
> HTH!
>
Thank you, it did!
Best,
David
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, David Craven david-at-craven.ch |Guix-box|
<7br2j1e...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> That sounds like it could work. I believe what you are looking for is
> the boot script contained in a system derivation. If you used guix
> system init to create the LXD image, you can
I installed ratpoison with root encrypted partition and it's work!
Thanks,On Dec 22, 2016 1:23 PM, Maxim Cournoyer
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the release, Ricardo!
>
> Maxim
>
On Wed, Dec 14 2016, Carlo Zancanaro wrote
I was trying to import some elpa packages recently and found
some issues, so here are some patches to fix them.
1. call-with-downloaded-file had behaviour different to how it
was documented to behave. This was primarily a problem when
trying to
The last staging branch was merged into the master branch on December
11.
According to the 3 week staging cycle we are trying to adhere to [0],
this would mean we freeze the current branch on December 25 and try to
merge it on January 1.
These dates are inconvenient for many people. I propose we
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:51:10PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (toxic): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 47
++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> +
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:23:39AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
The last staging branch was merged into the master branch on December
11.
According to the 3 week staging cycle we are trying to adhere to [0],
this would mean we freeze the current branch on December 25 and try
From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-hdf4.
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:09:07 +0100
Thomas Danckaert writes:
Hi Guix,
this patch adds python-hdf4. I'm not sure if the line “Python-HDF4
is a fork of pyhdf.” in the description is necessary. The original
and “official” pyhdf
Marius Bakke writes:
< snip >
> I can do these minor edits for you if you prefer, but would like to
> confirm name and email for the copyright. Thanks!
>
Thanks for your review -- I wish I responded earlier! Attached is a
revised patch.
> From 485bf8b610be2ba70c366b1d317cc1ab7acb7c61 Mon Sep
41 matches
Mail list logo