Hi Andreas,
Ludo's response clarified a lot of things for me. The only remaining
feedback I have is that (1) to aid the reader, you should consider
adding a cross-reference from "(guix) Mapped Devices" (in the part where
you mention that certain modules must be added) to "(guix) Initial RAM
Disk"
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
>>>
Dear Guix,
For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I fi
Hi,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> I just noticed that we still have a dmd package (that does not build on arm).
> Should we not drop it now that we have the shepherd?
Yes, please do.
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>>
Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
> Dear Guix,
>
> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
> build actions
Hello Guix!
I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the
GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNU Guix.
Ricardo is a long-time free software activist and has been making
significant contributions to Guix for the most part of its young history
in terms of code,
Pjotr,
On 26/07/2016 4:19, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> FOSDEM 2017 call for proposals has started: [...]
> Who wants to be part of this exciting day?
\o
I've never done anything like this before, but would like to help out if
and where I can.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Hi,
Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because
> of time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that
> would make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate
> list for patches. Or maybe the other way ar
Leo,
On 24/07/2016 2:06, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> but many packages — not all — also like to add a "See in the
>> distribution." Looking at guix/licenses.scm, this seems a bit redundant
>> to me. No?
>
> I think it's a matter of judgement. Sometimes it makes sense, sometimes
> not. The important t
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:44:48AM +, ng0 wrote:
> I would say we could keep "guix-devel" for patches and
> discussions around them and create another list for discussion,
> for example "guix-discuss".
> No fix, but could help to separate patches and general
> discussions.
Notice we already ha
Hello Pjotr,
On 07/26/16 05:19, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> FOSDEM 2017 call for proposals has started:
>
> https://fosdem.org/2017/news/2016-07-20-call-for-participation/
>
> We need help with writing the proposal (we can build on last years
> this time), we need help on selecting talks and we need
Congratulations Ricardo and best of luck with your new duties :-D
Manolis
I realized my previous message was probably confusing. Here are some
missing details that you may need to make sense of it.
* Go embeds its dependency information right into the source code.
* The command I gave gets its list of dependencies by parsing source
code, not that manifest file. Also, i
Hello!
Florian Paul Schmidt skribis:
> I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because
> of time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that
> would make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate
> list for patches. Or maybe the other way aroun
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:47:51AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> (with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding #f))
>>(substitute* (find-files "tests" "\\.c$")
>> (("(system *\\(\")(/[^ ]*)" all pre prog-path)
>> (let* ((base
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Everything that relates to command-line argument processing is in (guix
>> scripts build), for the common options, and then in each (guix scripts
>> *) module.
>>
>> Roughly, the
Hi Ricardo,
Thanks for the review again, the package definition is now simplier.
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Usually, we will split bundled libraries. For bundled “jar” archives
> this is necessary in any case as a “jar” file is a binary.
>
> If the libraries are bundled in source fo
I'm not sure a separate additional ML would enhance the situation,
the combined volume is low enough to let them stay together.
But resurrection & real use of patchwork (or any other consensus
web tracker) would be a plus for at least some of us newcomers
from different horizons.
I can understand
Alex Griffin skribis:
> This patch installs some icons so that the IceCat desktop menu entry
> displays its logo.
> --
> Alex Griffin
>
> From 3db1ee5a43de65ad14645267b1abcfd323304d45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Griffin
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 16:44:46 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: i
ng0 skribis:
> From a1a8085fa7626bde0fb1f8a28ba62f5a5c85584a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:07:03 +
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Add the revision in the example of 7.6.3.
>
> *doc/guix.texi (Version Numbers): Add the
> revision to the example of the git package u
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> From: Vincent Legoll
>
> * doc/guix.texi (USB install): add download & verify subsection,
Sorry for the delay! First some comments on the verification, which I
think should be treated in a separate commit:
> This image contains a single partition with the tools nece
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the
> GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNU Guix.
Congratulations Ricardo!
--
Mathieu Lirzin
Hi,
A package I'm working on depends on both qtbase and qtdeclarative. In
the configure phase I get an error that Qt5Config.cmake doesn't find
Qt5QmlConfig.cmake. When I use a snippet to remove this check I get:
```scheme
(snippet
'(substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
(("find_package.*Qt5.*Qml Q
> I took a slightly different approach in commit
> debc6360e111e8efc8a938b2aef28e5b3616ada8, where I essentially copied the
> text from “Binary Installation”.
OK, I saw that duplication, but only after I sent the patch for review...
> I’ll comment on the rest later.
Thanks
--
Vincent Legoll
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:28:56AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> Congrats Ricardo! I can think of no one better for the job. :)
Indeed, I concur! So congratulations to you, Ricardo, and also to Guix!
Andreas
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the
> GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNU Guix.
Congrats Ricardo! I can think of no one better for the job. :)
- Dave
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-26 12:50 +0300) wrote:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> But honestly, I think changing ‘--dry-run’ to do ‘--dry-run --no-grafts’
>>> would be fine, and probably better than the current situation.
>>
>> Could you provide some insight in where
Yes. I have run into the problem. Sadly, no I didn't work out how to fix it.
But during trying I did decide one thing - I will never use CMake in any of
my own projects.
J'
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:30:48PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
Hi,
A package I'm working on depends on bot
Hello everyone,
This is an updated version of the patch. There was a reference to
another patch of mine, so it couldn't apply cleanly on core-updates-next.
Ludo is it okay to push to core-updates-next?
On 06/17/16 19:09, Manolis Ragkousis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a patch from wip-hu
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the
> GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNU Guix.
>
> Ricardo is a long-time free software activist and has been making
> significant contributions to Guix for t
Hello David,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:30:48PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> the configure phase I get an error that Qt5Config.cmake doesn't find
> Qt5QmlConfig.cmake. When I use a snippet to remove this check I get:
>
> Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5Network"
> (
Hello,
speaking of gmime and gpg, in the latest evaluation of master on hydra:
http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109021
gnupg@2.1 fails its tests on i686:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1315032
Maybe someone involved in the recent gnupg changes could have a look?
I understand that the gmime failure is
Hello!
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> From a8541a554f9e1653c78b6b45f323426e330d5215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Manolis Ragkousis
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:53:40 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: make-bootstrap: Produce the correct
> %glibc-bootstrap-tarball for Hurd systems.
>
> * gnu/packag
Alex Kost skribis:
> The only way I see for the Emacs interface is to modify
> "emacs/guix-main.scm" to parameterize ‘%graft?’ as well and to set it
> depending on the current value of ‘dry-run’. AFAICT this
> parameterization should be added to:
>
> - 'process-package-actions': it is responsibl
The application I'm packaging requires qt >= 5.6. And it's not that
the modules aren't packaged. They aren't found. qtbase provides
Qt5NetworkConfig.cmake and Qt5Qml.cmake is provided by qtdeclarative.
That's why this is weird - I don't know why they aren't found since
CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH is set corr
Correction.
Segfaults when new emails are being added.
This is close to working, but needs some more fixes.
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> ng0 writes:
>>
>>> In gnu/packages/mail.scm I created this package.
>>> It builds succesfully, but when I run it, it segfaults.
>
> A v
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> In gnu/packages/mail.scm I created this package.
>> It builds succesfully, but when I run it, it segfaults.
A version bump fixed this.
Fixed, if the problem was not getting into the application and exiting,
this is now possible.
>> Running it in g
* gnu/packages/databases.scm (perl-db_file): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/databases.scm | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
index 86cf883..b5c6de0 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/databases.s
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’m happy to announce that Ricardo Wurmus has just been appointed by the
> GNU overseers to join me as co-maintainer of GNUGuix.
>
> Ricardo is a long-time free software activist and has been making
> significant contributions to Guix for the most part of
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:35:57 +0200
Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because of
> time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that would
> make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate list for
> patc
It's not functional yet, but this reflects my work in progress.
From 4bf9dd1e37bfba583fcf2d9a1c749c535eedf612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:15:55 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add neomutt.
* gnu/packages/mail.scm (neomutt): New variable.
Signed-off-by: ng0
---
gnu
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:47:51AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> (with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding #f))
>>(substitute* (find-files "tests" "\\.c$")
>> (("(system *\\(\")(/[^ ]*)" all pre prog-path)
>> (let* ((base (
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:04:43PM +, ng0 wrote:
In gnu/packages/mail.scm I created this package.
It builds succesfully, but when I run it, it segfaults.
Running it in gdb however makes it succeed and not
segfault. How do I debug such a software?
Let it generate coredump and open that in GD
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:43:05PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> The application I'm packaging requires qt >= 5.6. And it's not that
> the modules aren't packaged. They aren't found. qtbase provides
> Qt5NetworkConfig.cmake and Qt5Qml.cmake is provided by qtdeclarative.
No idea why this could happe
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:35:31 +0200
Andreas Enge wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/databases.scm (perl-db_file): New variable.
> > The name should be "perl-db-file": we replace all special characters with
> > "-".
The package name (not the variable name) was chosen by "guix import cpan".
* gnu/packages/databases.scm (perl-db_file): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/databases.scm | 32
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
index 86cf883..abda97b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/databases.scm
+++
Also I didn't mention that this only happens when running guix build
greenisland and not when running guix environment greenisland && cmake
.
The snippet is there because I know that Qml and Quick are there, they
just aren't being found. This let's the build continue until the
previous error.
I'm
> I'm still trying to compile qt 5.6.1-1 so that should fix the problem
> (when I get it to build), finding a cause to this problem would be
> very nice dough...
FYI: Finished building qt 5.6.1-1 and got past the configure stage.
I'd still be interested why it didn't work this way...
Hi Alex,
> Thanks for the review again, the package definition is now simplier.
You only attached the patch to the Clojure sources. Could you please
also attach the latest patch to add the clojure package?
> Yes, the ASM library is included as source (not jar) and is one majar
> version behind
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (httping): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 14ae5c3..4adc329 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.sc
From: Danny Milosavljevic
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-net-dns): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 9e4f7bb..a271543 100644
--- a/gnu/pa
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (httping): New variable.
[...]
> +(license (list license:agpl3; with permission to link with
> OpenSSL
> + license:gpl2 ; man pages ('httping*.1')
All I see is ‘license.txt’, which says that i
Hi,
I'm trying to package IO::Socket::INET6. However, its tests need to be able to
listen on an IPv6 port.
guix said:
> IO::Socket::INET6: sock_info: Bad protocol 'tcp' at t/blocking.t line 34.
What now?
From: Danny Milosavljevic
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-socket6): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index a271543..c56ec36 100644
---
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-net-dns-resolver-programmable): New
variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index c56ec36..2e2d379 100644
--- a/gn
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:01:38PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Yeah, I thought about it but decided against it - there are very few options
> in that file, substitute* can't substitute entire lines (or only at the
> beginning of the line) or entire words (so it's not safe), the us
Hi!
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> below is my (untested!) attempt at an u-boot-configuration for use like this
>
> (bootloader (u-boot-configuration (device "/dev/sda")))
Nice!
> It has been copied from gnu/system/grub.cfg and then I s/grub/u-boot/g and
> removed all the eyecandy stuff as
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-netaddr-ip): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 2e2d379..684fe2d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networkin
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:52:46AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I just noticed that we still have a dmd package (that does not build on
> > arm).
> > Should we not drop it now that we have the shepherd?
> Yes, please do.
Done in commit d3896fc4ce46e26f2ff7e633344fe38e044023f3.
Andreas
This patch fixes magit's interactive rebase function, which calls perl
and fails if perl is not in PATH.
--
Alex Griffin
From 1f73f2635225bfcf942194ffe8c02a07e4705d34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Griffin
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:29:51 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: magit: Fix interactive reb
Ludo',
On 26/07/2016 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> All I see is ‘license.txt’, which says that it’s under GPLv2-only.
> Should it be simply ‘license:gpl2’?
Dammit, you're right. I wrote the expression for my own use, using git,
then changed it back to a release for submission here. I didn't rea
* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-file-find-object): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/perl.scm | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm
index aed2a61..daf27f2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/perl.
* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-file-find-object-rule): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/perl.scm | 30 ++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm
index daf27f2..037edbe 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packag
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-net-patricia): Add variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 31 +++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 684fe2d..d6f9ac9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networkin
* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-trailingspace): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/perl.scm | 34 ++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm
index 037edbe..ef17b48 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packa
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-geo-ip): Add variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 41c42c3..79575d0 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
+++ b/g
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-net-cidr-lite): Add variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index d6f9ac9..41c42c3 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
++
Hi all,
another big failure: The python update from 2.7.10 to 2.7.11 breaks on mips;
there is one more test failing now (besides the already disabled ones):
test_ctypes.
Andreas
* gnu/packages/tls.scm (perl-crypt-openssl-bignum): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/tls.scm | 34 ++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
index bdc1d7c..695ef22 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages
* gnu/packages/tls.scm (perl-crypt-openssl-random): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/tls.scm | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
index 743cac3..7ebb41d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
@
* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-encode-detect): Add variable.
---
gnu/packages/perl.scm | 24
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm
index ef17b48..3c9923b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm
@@
* gnu/packages/tls.scm (perl-crypt-openssl-rsa): Add variable.
---
gnu/packages/tls.scm | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
index 7ebb41d..833bef1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/tls.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
Obsolete, replaced by "[PATCH v2] gnu: Add perl-crypt-openssl-bignum."
* gnu/packages/tls.scm (perl-crypt-openssl-bignum,
perl-crypt-openssl-arguments): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/tls.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
index bdc1d7c..743cac3 100644
--- a/gnu/p
* gnu/packages/mail.scm (perl-mailtools): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/mail.scm | 29 +++--
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
index 5a3ebf0..a6e2279 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mail.scm
+++ b/gnu/pac
* gnu/package/mail.scm (perl-mail-spf): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/mail.scm | 41 +
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
index a6e2279..6d47016 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mail.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/
Hi,
I'm trying to package spamassassin.
I've got it to work with
$ guix build -S spamassassin
... extract it
$ guix environment --pure spamassassin
$ perl Makefile.PL
PREFIX=/gnu/store/37hdpcyz1b6y5jjwzdmxw14gd1xsf9fv-spamassassin-3.4.1
INSTALLDIRS=site
$ make
... works fine.
But
$ guix pack
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (perl-io-socket-inet6): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 32
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index 14a968d..f89a73e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/netwo
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:47:51AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gmime: Remove gpg to gpg2 patch.
>
> * gnu/packages/mail.scm (gmime)[arguments]: Remove the patch which peviously
> changed gpg to gpg2 in 'patch-paths-in-tests phase.
Thanks, pushed as ae83dcf6ba9687b7ff123fdd4a81eb952b
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:35:28PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> speaking of gmime and gpg, in the latest evaluation of master on hydra:
>http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109021
> gnupg@2.1 fails its tests on i686:
>http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1315032
>
> Maybe someone involved in the r
Hi Danny,
Thanks for all your patches.
On 27/07/16 08:50, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to package spamassassin.
I've got it to work with
$ guix build -S spamassassin
... extract it
$ guix environment --pure spamassassin
$ perl Makefile.PL
PREFIX=/gnu/store/37hdpcyz1b6y5jjwzdmxw
* gnu/packages/networking.scm (python2-pydns): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
index f89a73e..616d616 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
+++ b/
* gnu/local.mk: Include gnu/packages/education.scm .
* gnu/packages/education.scm: Add new file.
* gnu/packages/education.scm (stellarium): New variable.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/education.scm | 70 ++
2 files changed, 71 inser
* gnu/local.mk: Include gnu/packages/education.scm .
* gnu/packages/education.scm: Add new file.
* gnu/packages/education.scm (stellarium): New variable.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/education.scm | 70 ++
2 files changed, 71 inser
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> Thanks for the review again, the package definition is now simplier.
>
> You only attached the patch to the Clojure sources. Could you please
> also attach the latest patch to add the clojure package?
>
Ahhh, I think I formatted the wrong patch
84 matches
Mail list logo
