Ludo', On 26/07/2016 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > All I see is ‘license.txt’, which says that it’s under GPLv2-only. > Should it be simply ‘license:gpl2’?
Dammit, you're right. I wrote the expression for my own use, using git, then changed it back to a release for submission here. I didn't realise the relicencing was so recent. However, in my AGPL3 HEAD, license.txt and LICENSE are still GPLv2 — i.e. wrong. I'll write myself a note to ignore them when updating. I'll send a note upstream as well. Thanks, T G-R
