Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fill package description in Info buffers.

2015-07-14 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-13 23:08 +0300) wrote: > * emacs/guix-info.el (guix-package-info-insert-heading): Add call to > 'fill-region'. > --- > emacs/guix-info.el | 7 +-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/emacs/guix-info.el b/emacs/guix-info.el > index bb21

Formatting lists in descriptions (was: [PATCH] gnu: Document xorg packages.)

2015-07-14 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-13 20:06 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: [...] >> And one more thing: there are "windowswmproto" and "libwindowswm" >> packages that have something to do with MS Windows and Cygwin. Do we >> need them? > > If that’s really what they are, let’s remove them. OK, I'll s

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-nokogiri

2015-07-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
Hi Ricardo, Many thanks for your help and bearing with me. Here the improved version of the code, would this be OK? I'll repost the patches when this looks good. Pj. diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/ruby-nokogiri-Rakefile.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/ruby-nokogiri-Rakefile.patch new file mode

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fill package description in Info buffers.

2015-07-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Alex Kost skribis: > Since there is a buffer-local 'fill-column' variable, I think we may use > it instead of hard-coding '72', so that a user could change it, for > example like this: > > (add-hook 'guix-package-info-mode-hook > (lambda () (setq fill-column 60))) Indeed, it’s better t

Re: Formatting lists in descriptions

2015-07-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-13 20:06 +0300) wrote: [...] >> Formatting will be lost in UIs, so this should be a comma-separated list >> instead. > > Currently the formatting is not lost in Emacs UI, but I agree on this one. The --show and --search options fill paragraphs, and

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-nokogiri

2015-07-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
> +(arguments > + '(#:tests? #f ;; test fails because nokogiri can only test with > +;; an installed extension (now part of install > +;; phase You should use a single semicolon for each line here or convert the comment to not share a line with ‘#:t

[PATCH] gnu: Add sox.

2015-07-14 Thread Alex Kost
Is "audio.scm" the right place for this package? BTW there is "audacity.scm"; shouldn't 'audacity' package be moved to "audio.scm" as well? >From cbbebb51841f073a64a83d5c56e92333d1b743fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Kost Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:15:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sox.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sox.

2015-07-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
> Is "audio.scm" the right place for this package? BTW there is > "audacity.scm"; shouldn't 'audacity' package be moved to "audio.scm" as > well? I would say “audio.scm” is the right place. ‘audacity’ was placed in its own module to avoid dependency cycles, if I recall correctly. (While we are

RE: Formatting lists in descriptions

2015-07-14 Thread Cook, Malcolm
> Yes, why not; it’s still not very pleasant to the eye but at least it > formatting > will be preserved (except for guix-web, but we can fix it > later.) > > > And as I have an unhealthy desire to organize the same things in the > > same manner, what variant to choose for formatting lists? Shou

Timestamps in tarballs created by 'patch-and-repack'

2015-07-14 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello Guix, One of the MIPS build slaves has a malfunctioning clock, and sometimes I discover that the clock is several days behind or ahead. In the past I've been able to simply reset the clock and restart builds, but now I have a more serious problem: Patched tarballs created by 'patch-and-rep

Re: Timestamps in tarballs created by 'patch-and-repack'

2015-07-14 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Hello Guix, > > One of the MIPS build slaves has a malfunctioning clock, and sometimes I > discover that the clock is several days behind or ahead. In the past > I've been able to simply reset the clock and restart builds, but now I > have a more serious problem: > > Patc

Re: Timestamps in tarballs created by 'patch-and-repack'

2015-07-14 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> However, this raises a deeper problem: all of the outputs of >> 'patch-and-repack' contain non-deterministic timestamps, and these >> timestamps can cause problems with future builds. >> >> Would it be sufficient to simply zero out all of the ti

[PATCH] gnu: Add exempi and eog.

2015-07-14 Thread David Hashe
Hello Guix, The attached patches add Eye of GNOME and one of its dependencies, exempi. The Eye of GNOME (eog) patch depends on the exempi patch. Thanks, David From cf0f69390f00852b9971e88e5e817ca540264d88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Hashe Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:02:02 -0500 Subject: [

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add exempi and eog.

2015-07-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi David, > +(define-public eog > + (package > + (name "eog") > + (version "3.16.2") > + (source (origin > +(method url-fetch) > +(uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" name "/" > +(version-major+minor version) "/" > +