> Is "audio.scm" the right place for this package? BTW there is > "audacity.scm"; shouldn't 'audacity' package be moved to "audio.scm" as > well?
I would say “audio.scm” is the right place. ‘audacity’ was placed in its own module to avoid dependency cycles, if I recall correctly. (While we are talking about moving stuff, I suggest moving packages from ‘pulseaudio.scm’ to just ‘audio.scm’.) ~~ Ricardo
