Hello,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 06:41:49PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> The form feeds that you just removed were put in by civodul in commit
> c84d0eca053cd524294ad10c1f49a877902932c4. Presumably he put them there
> intentionally. Did you intend to remove them as part of this unrelated
> bluez
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 07:17:35PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> The only change you actually made to messaging.scm in this commit was to
> add your copyright notice.
That was a mistake, I intended to make the change announced in the commit
message. Probably a consequence of juggling with too many
Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes:
> I attach my implementation. It works, but since I'm a novice, it may
> not be pretty :) So, comments are very welcomed.
Nice work! I have noticed some trailing whitespaces. In emacs you can
invoke 'M-x delete-trailing-whitespace' before saving.
--
Mathieu Lir
Commit 2e88d11 suggests that dbus-glib-1.pc mentions GLib and DBus.
That’s one of the two criteria that we use to add propagate inputs.
So that part of the commit is OK.
As for removing DBus and GLib as inputs of the other packages, it’s
really a question of whether the package uses them directly
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
> On 2015-05-22 08:29, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>> Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
>>
>>> I think I understand the Scheme side of the website now and I'm able
>>> to build the HTML using the REPL, so I'd like to give it a try.
>>
>> Excellent, thank you!
>>
>> Lu
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Commit 2e88d11 suggests that dbus-glib-1.pc mentions GLib and DBus.
> That’s one of the two criteria that we use to add propagate inputs.
> So that part of the commit is OK.
>
> As for removing DBus and GLib as inputs of the other packages, it’s
> really a
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 06:41:49PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> The form feeds that you just removed were put in by civodul in commit
>> c84d0eca053cd524294ad10c1f49a877902932c4. Presumably he put them there
>> intentionally. Did you intend to remove them as part of thi
On 2015-05-24 07:58, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes:
I attach my implementation. It works, but since I'm a novice, it may
not be pretty :) So, comments are very welcomed.
Nice work! I have noticed some trailing whitespaces. In emacs you can
invoke 'M-x delete-trailing
On 2015-05-24 08:19, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
On 2015-05-22 08:29, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
I think I understand the Scheme side of the website now and I'm able
to build the HTML using the REPL, so I'd like to give it a try.
Exc
2015-05-21 23:43 GMT+02:00 Luis Felipe López Acevedo <
felipe.lo...@openmailbox.org>:
> On 2015-05-20 14:22, Paul van der Walt wrote:
>
>> Hello Guix,
>>
>> Minor headache i had, thought i'd share.
>>
>> Went to the website to download the binary tarball (which seems to work
>> very well, kudos!),
On 2015-05-24 11:44, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
2015-05-21 23:43 GMT+02:00 Luis Felipe López Acevedo
:
[...]
Hey, Paul, thanks for your feedback.
The items in the download page will be updated to look like in the
following mock-up to make them more compact:
https://multimedialib.files.wor
Luis,
your work on the website is very appreciated, just check result with
e.g.
https://validator.w3.org/
for syntax and other errors. Then it would be perfect.
Regards
Adam Pribyl
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Amirouche BOUBEKKI wrote:
Le mardi 19 mai 2015 à 10:55 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus a écrit :
Hi Fabian,
But the system build broke.
What exactly does this mean?
I used a Lenovo T60 with just 1GB RAM. What hardware do i need to
build a Guix system? I used the very tiny syste
Ludovic Courtès (2015-05-22 16:28 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> So I'm wondering is there a way to init a 64-bit system from a 32-bit
>> one or perhaps it's just not possible?
>
> It actually is possible, but a little bit trickier. Mark did it a few
> weeks ago, though in a slightl
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for
> > which we don’t know?
> FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would entail
> more rebuilding, but i
On 2015-05-24 13:31, Adam Pribyl wrote:
Luis,
your work on the website is very appreciated, just check result with
e.g.
https://validator.w3.org/
for syntax and other errors. Then it would be perfect.
Regards
Adam Pribyl
Hi Adam.
Yes, I'm aware of those. Most of them are because of a mi
On 2015-05-24 17:48, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote:
Hi Adam.
Yes, I'm aware of those. Most of them are because of a missing Doctype
definition on all pages, and because of using XML syntax in
self-closing elements. Part of that is related to the current SXML to
XML conversion method.
I mean
17 matches
Mail list logo
