2015-05-21 23:43 GMT+02:00 Luis Felipe López Acevedo < felipe.lo...@openmailbox.org>:
> On 2015-05-20 14:22, Paul van der Walt wrote: > >> Hello Guix, >> >> Minor headache i had, thought i'd share. >> >> Went to the website to download the binary tarball (which seems to work >> very well, kudos!), but was bitten by the fact that the GuixSD and GNU >> Guix downloads aren't separated. I first ended up with GuixSD instead of >> Guix, then after reading way too quickly concluded that i686 was what i >> wanted, ended up with the wrong Guix for my platform (x86_64, which is >> visually at the end of the "list" containing GuixSD 0.8.2 (x86_64) and >> GuixSD 0.8.2 (i686)). >> >> So, i realise i should read more carefully and all, but perhaps a >> horizontal rule between the two GuixSD and the 4 GNU Guix downloads >> would be nice? >> >> Feel free to call me hasty and myopic or just ignore me. Otherwise it >> looks really polished, congrats :) >> >> Ciao, >> p. >> > > Hey, Paul, thanks for your feedback. > > The items in the download page will be updated to look like in the > following mock-up to make them more compact: > > > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/guixsd-downloads-mockup-2015-05-21.png > > Hopefully, the new design will also help people What do you think about using a “laptop logo” or something for GSD instead of the “package”? > who push buttons without reading (just kidding :)). > Those who don't know the difference between GSD and Guix :) > > -- > Luis Felipe López Acevedo > http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ > >
