Hi!
Marek Benc skribis:
> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
OK, perfect. :-)
> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm
> sorry if I messed up somewhere.
> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be
> formatted slightly differently, so
On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi!
Hello,
Could you send an updated patch in the format produced by ‘git
format-patch’, and with a ChangeLog-style commit log? See “Submitting
Patches” in the ‘HACKING’ file for details.
Will do.
+(uri
+ (string-append "http
On 09/01/2014 03:33 PM, Marek Benc wrote:
> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
>
> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry
> if I messed up somewhere.
> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be formatted
> slightly differently, so
Cyril Roelandt writes:
> Maybe we should have all vi-like editors in one file. We currently have
> vim in gnu/packages/vim.scm, maybe we should have both nvi and vim in
> gnu/packages/vi.scm, WDYT ?
I think at least Vim is, on the meanwhile, a very different beast from
any random vi implementati
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 09/01/2014 03:33 PM, Marek Benc wrote:
>> Disregard my previous email, I figured it out.
>>
>> Here is my favorite text editor. This is my first package, so I'm sorry
>> if I messed up somewhere.
>> The formatting is probably bad, but every package seemed to be form
> This is due to the lack of the above LIBRARY_PATH setting.
>
> Could you try setting and report back?
I'll be away from my computer for 2 weeks. Will report as soon as I
will try out.
Thanks.
Fede
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer skribis:
> Do we have any guidelines regarding what packages go in what files, or
> is it determined on an "intuitive" basis?
The latter. :-)
That’s not ideal, but from my experience with Nixpkgs, it’s hard to find
a formal categorization scheme that would be reall
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Shouldn’t it be
>> https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files/... ? (This is
>> the URL given on the home page.)
> Actually, no. The actual home page, according to Debain, is
> http://www.kotnet.org/~ski
On 09/02/2014 02:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Marek Benc skribis:
On 09/02/2014 10:19 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
Shouldn’t it be
https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files/... ? (This is
the URL given on the home page.)
Actually, no. The actual home page, according to
Marek Benc skribis:
> On 09/02/2014 02:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Could you send the patch (with the added comments) as an attachment,
>> because the mail client apparently mangled it?
>
> Okay, It's as an attachment. Here's the changelog entries:
>
> 2014-09-02 Marek Benc
> * gnu/
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-31 23:57 +0400) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Perhaps even a different format, like, say:
>>
>> The following package will be upgraded:
>> guile 1.8.8 → 2.0.9out /gnu/store/...
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think, it would be perfect!
Commit ef8993
Ludovic Courtès (2014-09-02 02:28 +0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> I've just pushed a manual for “guix.el” (into “emacs-ui” branch). I
>> tried my best, but I'm not a native English speaker and I have never
>> worked with Texinfo before, so there may be... issues :-)
>
> Looks good to me!
Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-31 18:59 +0400) wrote:
[...]
> I think the profile’s file name could be kept on the elisp side, and
> passed to the Scheme code, which wouldn’t need to keep it in a global
> variable. That would also allow guix.el to be used on profiles other
> than the default one.
Don
Ludovic Courtès (2014-09-01 16:10 +0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-31 18:59 +0400) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> The key is ‘vhash-fold*’ (info "(guile) VHashes"). It allows you to
>>> traverse all the entries associated with a given key:
>>>
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> (vh
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>> Test end:
>> result-kind: fail
>> actual-value: #f
>> actual-error: (srfi-34 #> file descriptor 1599602736: Bad file descriptor" status: 1] 8a62798>)
>
> That one occurs many times. I suspect this has to do with the daemon
> features enabled by c04
BTW, I’ve been traveling lately, and I’ve really missed ‘guix prefetch’.
So if you have spare time to pour into it, or if someone else wants to
take it over, that’d be nice!
Ludo’.
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-08-31 18:59 +0400) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I think the profile’s file name could be kept on the elisp side, and
>> passed to the Scheme code, which wouldn’t need to keep it in a global
>> variable. That would also allow guix.el to be used on profiles othe
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2014-09-02 02:28 +0400) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> I've just pushed a manual for “guix.el” (into “emacs-ui” branch). I
>>> tried my best, but I'm not a native English speaker and I have never
>>> worked with Texinfo before, so there may be... iss
> BTW, I’ve been traveling lately, and I’ve really missed ‘guix
> prefetch’.
Heh, that was the motivation.
> So if you have spare time to pour into it, or if someone else wants to
> take it over, that’d be nice!
I doubt so, unfortunately. So please do take it over if you can.
pgpMOhIZmPKkm.pg
>From 4b760e9504f608ba460b85413206dbd5658fe78c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:06:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add postgresql.
* gnu/packages/postgresql.scm: New file.
* gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
---
gnu-system.am | 1 +
g
20 matches
Mail list logo
