Carlos Carleos skribis:
>
> Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.22
>
> # TOTAL: 551
> # PASS: 411
> # SKIP: 139
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL: 1
>
Carlos Carleos skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès escribió / skribis [*]:
>
>> Did ‘make check’ in Guix pass in the first place?
>
> Yes:
Great.
>> Is the daemon running as noted at:
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Setting-Up-the-Daemon
>
> I think so:
>
> root@carleos:/usr/l
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I pushed a new core-updates branch, with some of the changes I had in
> mind. Go ahead if you know of anything that needs to be fixed there.
>
> As discussed before, we’ll merge the branch before June 13th.
One week left!
As far as I’m concerned, there
Hello,
The GNU distribution provided by Guix contains package synopses and
descriptions that we would like to translate (see [0] to get an idea.)
For GNU packages, synopses and descriptions are kept in sync with files
from the GNU womb, which are in turn used to generate a web page [1].
Translati
> I believe the ‘modules’ field can be omitted.
Done, I forgot to do that in the first place :P
>
>> +(propagated-inputs `(("gnumach-headers" ,gnumach-headers)
>> + ("hurd-headers" ,hurd-headers)
>> + ("hurd-minimal" ,hurd-minimal)))
>
> Add a one
This patch should fix the failing rdup build. I'm sending it to the list
because I wonder if there's a better way to handle the missing script
shebangs?
`~Eric
From d27203fa893bba8c263aa519124af3cbb3178cee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:45:31 -0500
Subject: [
