Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job > to commit their translations to www. There would likely be duplicated work if there were both www and non www people translating these things, which is why I started this discussion. Are you

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job > to commit their translations to www. There would likely be duplicated work if there were both www and non www people translating these things, which is why I started this discussion. Are you

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

On 01/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: > "Ineiev via RT" skribis: > >> If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job >> to commit their translations to www. > > There would likely be duplicated work if there were both www and non www > people translat

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote: No, I'm suggesting that it's possible to delegate the work to groups other than GNU web translators (especially when we have no active team for a language), and www.gnu.org can take advantage of it. I agree - and t

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote: No, I'm suggesting that it's possible to delegate the work to groups other than GNU web translators (especially when we have no active team for a language), and www.gnu.org can take advantage of it. I agree - and t

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > On 01/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: >> "Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> >>> If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job >>> to commit their translations to www. >> >> There would likely be duplicated work if there were bot

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > On 01/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: >> "Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> >>> If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job >>> to commit their translations to www. >> >> There would likely be duplicated work if there were bot

Re: GUIX on fedora 14

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Omar Tarabai skribis: > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Omar Tarabai skribis: > >> > >> > I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel. > >> > > >> > Running the following

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

On 01/09/2014 01:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: > I mean, we already have a few package translations at > (representing the only > package file currently in POTFILES), but obviously the translators were > not aware of what was being done on

Re: GUIX on fedora 14

Omar Tarabai skribis: > No luck with setcap either. Its possible that since planetlab nodes we are > using are running on linux-vservers > which is an operating system-level > visualization and perhaps it applies > some restrictions on the user capabilities to

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > I think it can be organized this way: > > (0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www > translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files; > > (1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send > a copy to the re

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > I think it can be organized this way: > > (0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www > translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files; > > (1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send > a copy to the re

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

On 01/10/2014 03:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: >> >> (0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www >> translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files; >> >> (1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send >> a copy to the res