Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Efraim, On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 09:01, Efraim Flashner wrote: >What parts of codeberg do you find slow? Is it loading the > website or navigating between different pages or a different workflow? Somehow loading the website and then navigate between different pages. But that’s not

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-21 Thread Alexis Simon
Hello, For those interested I tried the AGit workflow [1] on guix-science and it worked nicely to start a PR from the command line without forking [2]. Not sure it was mentioned before. Alexis [1] https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/src/branch/v7.0/docs/user/agit-support.md [2] https://codeb

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-20 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 13:39, Rostislav Svoboda wrote: > People, I find codeberg to be slow :-/ It’s “slow“ on my side too but not slower than gitlab.com or gitlab.inria.fr or etc. :-) My main annoyance isn’t “slow” but I cannot locally cache. It’s impracticable when you have a poor netw

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-18 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Olivier, On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 13:51, Olivier Dion wrote: > I have not follow the entire thread about this migration. > > Will the mail-patch workflow still available? The mail-patch workflow is still available. It will be available until a GCD changing is accepted. And such GCD will expl

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-18 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Ludo, On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 17:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >perhaps even before GCD #001 is committed > (not sure what’s going on here :-)) Probably because I’m lagging… Well, now it’s ready from my side. :-) Feel free to tweak, if it’s not clear enough. Cheer

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-18 Thread Rostislav Svoboda
People, I find codeberg to be slow :-/ Cheers, Bost

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-16 Thread Olivier Dion
I have not follow the entire thread about this migration. Will the mail-patch workflow still available? On Sun, 16 Feb 2025, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix, > > I’ll be formally posting GCD #002 soon (“Migrating repositories, issues, > and patches to Codeberg”), perhaps even before GCD #0

Re: Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-16 Thread Rostislav Svoboda
Hello Ludo' > 1. try and look at pull requests, but only for trivial packaging > changes (I will close pull requests that don’t fit the bill); Please pull this one: https://codeberg.org/civodul/guix/pulls/3 That's an ideal candidate. It's just a silly Emacs package that "displays a buffer

Trying out Codeberg

2025-02-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix, I’ll be formally posting GCD #002 soon (“Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”), perhaps even before GCD #001 is committed (not sure what’s going on here :-)), but before I do, and as a followup to our discussions at the Guix Days, here’s an offer for those who want