On 2022-07-04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>> --- a/gnu/packages/tex.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/tex.scm
>> @@ -395,6 +395,12 @@ (define-public texlive-bin
>> (("srcdir/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1 \\|\\| exit
>> 1")
>>"srcdi
Hi!
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> --- a/gnu/packages/tex.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/tex.scm
> @@ -395,6 +395,12 @@ (define-public texlive-bin
> (("srcdir/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1 \\|\\| exit
> 1")
>"srcdir/tests/pprecA-0.ind pprecA-0.ind1 || ex
On 2022-06-23, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>> Perhaps to show our stand here we could patch our copy of pdftex with
>>> 's/FORCE_SOURCE_DATE/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH/', lest we end up with a grocery
>>> list of *SOURCE_DATE* variable variants.
>>
>> Sure, with some technical details fixed up, as I think they
Hi Vagrant,
[...]
>> Perhaps to show our stand here we could patch our copy of pdftex with
>> 's/FORCE_SOURCE_DATE/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH/', lest we end up with a grocery
>> list of *SOURCE_DATE* variable variants.
>
> Sure, with some technical details fixed up, as I think they are
> functionally diff
On 2022-06-22, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>> On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
That said, some projects (such as texlive) might be worried about
messing with time too much (I get it, lots of cautionary sci-fi
stories!), and
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> On 2022-06-22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>>
>>> On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
I'd much prefer challenging that stance than "endorsing" it in Guix :-).
I think it'd be OK to reluctantly add it in
Zhu Zihao schreef op wo 22-06-2022 om 23:16 [+0800]:
>
> Can we make some experiments on the Linux time namespace for build
> sandbox?
>
> This can mock the real system with our desired value, maybe a good
> solution for the reproduciblity on Linux machine.
>
> Ref: https://man7.org/linux/man-pa
On 2022-06-22, Zhu Zihao wrote:
> Can we make some experiments on the Linux time namespace for build
> sandbox?
>
> This can mock the real system with our desired value, maybe a good
> solution for the reproduciblity on Linux machine.
>
> Ref: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/time_namespaces.7
Can we make some experiments on the Linux time namespace for build
sandbox?
This can mock the real system with our desired value, maybe a good
solution for the reproduciblity on Linux machine.
Ref: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/time_namespaces.7.html
--
Retrieve my PGP public key:
gp
On 2022-06-22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>
>> On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I'd much prefer challenging that stance than "endorsing" it in Guix :-).
>>> I think it'd be OK to reluctantly add it in as a stop-gap fix in Guix,
>>> but *only* after ope
Hi,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>>> So, guix sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1 by default in
>>> guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm, which is great!
>>>
>>> This allows guix packages in many cases to build packages reproducibly,
>>> with a
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
[...]
>> I'd much prefer challenging that stance than "endorsing" it in Guix :-).
>> I think it'd be OK to reluctantly add it in as a stop-gap fix in Guix,
>> but *only* after opening an issue to discuss it upstream and linking
On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
>> So, guix sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1 by default in
>> guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm, which is great!
>>
>> This allows guix packages in many cases to build packages reproducibly,
>> with a curious side-effect that takes us all bac
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> So, guix sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1 by default in
> guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm, which is great!
>
> This allows guix packages in many cases to build packages reproducibly,
> with a curious side-effect that takes us all back to the early 70s in
> some co
On 2022-06-21, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-06-15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>>> From 7a39330b56934accef14b5e2ac003e211c7c6c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>>> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:12:59 -0700
>>> Subject: [PATCH] guix: gnu-build-syste
On 2022-06-15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>> From 7a39330b56934accef14b5e2ac003e211c7c6c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:12:59 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] guix: gnu-build-system: Set FORCE_SOURCE_DATE in
>> set-SOURCE-DATE
On 2022-06-15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>
>> From 7a39330b56934accef14b5e2ac003e211c7c6c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:12:59 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] guix: gnu-build-system: Set FORCE_SOURCE_DATE in
>> set-SOURCE-DA
Hi!
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> From 7a39330b56934accef14b5e2ac003e211c7c6c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vagrant Cascadian
> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:12:59 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] guix: gnu-build-system: Set FORCE_SOURCE_DATE in
> set-SOURCE-DATE-EPOCH phase.
>
> * guix/build/gnu-buil
So, guix sets SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1 by default in
guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm, which is great!
This allows guix packages in many cases to build packages reproducibly,
with a curious side-effect that takes us all back to the early 70s in
some corner-cases (or even late 60s, dependent on timezone)
19 matches
Mail list logo
