Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@reproducible-builds.org> skribis: > On 2022-06-21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
[...] >> I'd much prefer challenging that stance than "endorsing" it in Guix :-). >> I think it'd be OK to reluctantly add it in as a stop-gap fix in Guix, >> but *only* after opening an issue to discuss it upstream and linking to >> that issue in Guix. > > I get it. I really do. It kind of grates at me every time I think about > this. :-) Another option would be to patch TeX Live, assuming the FORCE_SOURCE_DATE bit is well isolated in a single file. Would that seem reasonable/feasible/desirable to you, Vagrant? Ludo’.
