On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:12:55AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-02-24, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:21:02PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> On 2025-02-23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> > Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> >> >
> >> >> The generated tarball also a
Am Mittwoch, dem 26.02.2025 um 10:12 -0800 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
> > > gnu/packages/patches/gegl-compatibility-old-librsvg.patch
> >
> > I think this patch was lost during a gnome-team merge. We should
> > probably ask the gnome-team. I believe it isn't needed, there is a
> > substitute f
On 2025-02-24, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:21:02PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2025-02-23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>> >
>> >> The generated tarball also appears to be missing a few files, some of
>> >> which seem fine (e.g. .gitignor
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:06:43PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-02-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2025-02-11, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> >> We discussed the next release during Guix Days and I volunteered to lead
> >> the effort.
> ...
> > I may just make an attempt at making a git
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 01:21:02PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-02-23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> >
> >> The generated tarball also appears to be missing a few files, some of
> >> which seem fine (e.g. .gitignore) but some which actually cause problems
> >
On 2025-02-23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>
>> The generated tarball also appears to be missing a few files, some of
>> which seem fine (e.g. .gitignore) but some which actually cause problems
>> (e.g. missing po4a.cfg, tests/*.scm, gnu/patches/*.patch), some of which
>> p
Hi,
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> The generated tarball also appears to be missing a few files, some of
> which seem fine (e.g. .gitignore) but some which actually cause problems
> (e.g. missing po4a.cfg, tests/*.scm, gnu/patches/*.patch), some of which
> probably should be added to dist_patch_DA
Hello Vagrant.
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> Also, in reviewing the copyright and license headers while packaging for
> Debian, this raised a broader question about translating license headers
> in files such as doc/guix.de.info:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/guix/-/blob/debian/latest/do
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:06:43PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-02-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On 2025-02-11, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> >> We discussed the next release during Guix Days and I volunteered to lead
> >> the effort.
> ...
> > I may just make an attempt at making a git
On 2025-02-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-02-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2025-02-11, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>> We discussed the next release during Guix Days and I volunteered to lead
>>> the effort.
> ...
>> I may just make an attempt at making a git snapshot or something, which
>>
On 2025-02-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Also, in reviewing the copyright and license headers while packaging for
> Debian, this raised a broader question about translating license headers
> in files such as doc/guix.de.info:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/guix/-/blob/debian/latest/doc/g
Also, thank you for tackling this!
-- Ian
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
On 2025-02-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
The generated tarball also appears to be missing a few files,
some of
which seem fine (e.g. .gitignore) but some which actually cause
problems
(e.g. missing po4a.cfg, tests/*.scm, gnu/patches/*.patch), some
of wh
13 matches
Mail list logo