Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello Leo,
>
> Am Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 01:47:03PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari:
>> I agree, we don't have to have a team for this. I'm not sure anyone else
>> cares about the "media" packages as a whole. But if there is interest,
>> that's good too.
>
> as an outsider
Hello Leo,
Am Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 01:47:03PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> I agree, we don't have to have a team for this. I'm not sure anyone else
> cares about the "media" packages as a whole. But if there is interest,
> that's good too.
as an outsider, I would just like to chime in that I lik
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:01:28AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> It doesn't seem like a core package to me, but also every branch doesn't
> need a team. It's fine to have a ffmpeg or ffmpeg-update branch and just
> bump that one package.
>
> There's a balance to be struck in grouping packages
Andy Tai writes:
> Hi, shall changes to non-core packages like ffmpeg still be in the
> scope of core-updates?
>
> ffmpeg, for example, is no where near the core of the GNU system like
> glibc, but still it is widely dependent upon. But it would make no
> sense to have a ffmpeg-team because it
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 02:32:01PM -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
> Hi, shall changes to non-core packages like ffmpeg still be in the
> scope of core-updates?
>
> ffmpeg, for example, is no where near the core of the GNU system like
> glibc, but still it is widely dependent upon. But it would make no
>
