Andy Tai <a...@atai.org> writes: > Hi, shall changes to non-core packages like ffmpeg still be in the > scope of core-updates? > > ffmpeg, for example, is no where near the core of the GNU system like > glibc, but still it is widely dependent upon. But it would make no > sense to have a ffmpeg-team because it is used by packages over wide > areas, KDE, GNOME and others. It is not well defined in a package > realm like GNOME packages. > > The last core-update branch was used to update ffmpeg. This seems to > still better to be true or to remain the same, no?
It doesn't seem like a core package to me, but also every branch doesn't need a team. It's fine to have a ffmpeg or ffmpeg-update branch and just bump that one package. There's a balance to be struck in grouping packages together to both minimise builds but also make changes easier to test.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
