Re: Users of demlo package.

Am Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 07:03:46PM -0800 schrieb Felix Lechner: > As a general matter, I'd just drop it. The package is easy to re-add > later, if needed. This is always the case for leaf packages. Since we have a removal policy, we should follow it. (Well, I am aware of a mild contradiction, sin

Re: Users of demlo package.

Hi Oleg & Andreas, On Sat, Feb 22 2025, Andreas Enge wrote: > upstream was also the packager; there is a certain probability that > the package has never been used by anyone else. > So I would suggest to send this patch to the issue tracker, maybe cc-ing > the packager, and see what happens duri

Re: Users of demlo package.

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 11:06:54AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Oleg, > > Am Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:28:45AM + schrieb Sharlatan Hellseher: > > Upstream has last time activity in 2019 > > , as for me, it's more dead project > > than alive :-). > > Quest

Re: Users of demlo package.

Hello Oleg, Am Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:28:45AM + schrieb Sharlatan Hellseher: > Upstream has last time activity in 2019 > , as for me, it's more dead project > than alive :-). > Question to the team: Demplo holds a bunch of quite old, never updated > in upstr