Hello,
Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 07:09:46PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> > This looks a lot like https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75893 .
> > I should test with your fix on the tex-team branch.
> I would indeed appreciate some feedback!
as mentioned in the issue, your fix appears to work very well.
Am Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 03:21:15PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> The upgrade process is explained at length in the comments of the
> "tex.scm" module in case anyone is curious about it.
> I don’t keep track of anything. I let the importer tell me what packages
> disappeared, and what are the new
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Actually I am wrong, it is CTAN, not Texlive. And CTAN contains rather
> obscure packages, such as the thesis format for this or that university,
> which I suppose are not shipped as part of Texlive.
I believe TeX Live includes all free parts of CTAN. In particular
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:51:24PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 07:09:46PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> > > This looks a lot like https://issues.guix.gnu.org/75893 .
> > > I should test with your fix on the tex-team branch.
> > I would indeed appreciate some
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> So maybe once the fix for issue 75893 is pushed and the modular texlive
> updated to version 2025, it will finally be time to retire the
> monolithic package.
Modular TeX Live 2025 is on its way!
> Well, I do not know how complicated it will be to update the modul
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> For compiling a set of slides of a talk, now time is an issue:
> real 0m36,095s
> user 0m13,706s
> sys 0m22,710s
>
> With the monolithic texlive:
> real 0m9,127s
> user 0m9,260s
> sys 0m0,613s
> (which is already a lot when one has to recompile every time af
Hello Nicolas,
Am Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:20:01PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> FWIW, I think texlive-scheme-* packages are opinionated collections that
> have no other purpose than recreating past TeX distributions. One should
> only rely on texlive-collection-* packages.
> What collection to
Am Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:20:01PM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> > I have a local copy of the 4GB file texlive-20240312-texmf.tar.xz in my
> > home directory, which I put into the store with "guix download".
> That’s tantamount to cheating! It is smart, but since Guix provides
> a `texlive' pack
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> My workflow when updating Guix is as follows:
> I have a local copy of the 4GB file texlive-20240312-texmf.tar.xz in my
> home directory, which I put into the store with "guix download". Then
> "guix shell -D texlive" creates the texlivetexmf package locally while
>
Hello,
Am Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:50:02AM +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> It is not the case anymore. However, Andreas Enge (Cc’ed) prefers to
> keep it as a no-brainer for anyone who wants to compile TeX documents
> and can afford the download cost. I’d love to get feedback about the
> compariso
Hello,
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." writes:
> Thanks for that analysis! I had the innocuous-looking 'texlive' in my
> Guix Home profile. That package pulls in texlivetexmf-${date}. [1] Was
> that my error?
No, it wasn’t. The `texlive' package is
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Jan 10 2025, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> don’t need every package in there
Thanks for that analysis! I had the innocuous-looking 'texlive' in my
Guix Home profile. That package pulls in texlivetexmf-${date}. [1] Was
that my error?
Kind regards
Felix
P.S. After a good night's
Hello,
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." writes:
> I am talking about 'texlivetexmf-20240312'.
>
> While I'm lucky that there is a substitute, I can hardly use it.
The `texlivetexmf' package has a `#:substitutable #f' flag. Unless I’m
mistaken, you’re
Hi Nicolas,
On Sat, Oct 26 2024, Nicolas Goaziou via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution." wrote:
> What TexLive are you talking about?
I am talking about 'texlivetexmf-20240312'.
While I'm lucky that there is a substitute, I can hardly use it. At
3.95GB and 31 kB/sec dow
Hello,
Felix Lechner writes:
> Should updates to TexLive or its prerequisites fall under the
> core-updates policy (or whatever its successor is)?
>
> My Guix is heavily modified and building TexLive takes an hour and a
> half. Grafting it takes nearly as long. Thanks!
What TexLive are you tal
15 matches
Mail list logo
