On 17 Jan 09:53 Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Mikhail Kryshen writes:
>
> > - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be
> > called texlive-lh?).
>
> Thank you, that’s a good one. Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
> are of the old type that may very well be incomplete. I’l
Hey Marius,
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> I'll look into updating the remaining texlive packages shortly.
>
> Now this was some rocket science...
>
> The attached 9 patches updates everything (I think) to 2019.3.
This looks great!
It’s odd that they removed the few remaining scripts for generat
Mikhail Kryshen writes:
> - font files are missing from texlive-latex-lh (shouldn't it be called
> texlive-lh?).
Thank you, that’s a good one. Generally, the texlive-latex-* packages
are of the old type that may very well be incomplete. I’ll replace this
one with texlive-lh which will incl
Hello,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>
>> What I wanted to work on is packaging all the texlive packages
>> according to the tlpdb (the TexLive package database). This should fix
>> the broken packages. Not sure if there is something else wrong with the
>> fonts.
>
> This
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Bug 33094 refers to this issue.
>
> There is no bug specifically about LaTeX, but LaTeX on Guix has been
> broken for a year or so. I think it was only discussed informally on
> guix-devel.
I’ve worked to fix incomplete packages some time ago. That’s why I
extende
Bug 33094 refers to this issue.
There is no bug specifically about LaTeX, but LaTeX on Guix has been
broken for a year or so. I think it was only discussed informally on
guix-devel.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> What I wanted to work on is packaging all the texlive packages
> according to the tlpdb (the TexLive package database). This should fix
> the broken packages. Not sure if there is something else wrong with the
> fonts.
This has already been done for most of the pa
Marius Bakke writes:
> I get a similar error for 'asymptote' on the current master branch, but
> that seems to be sporadically working on Berlin?
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=system%3Ax86_64-linux+asymptote
Yes, this issue has been around for about a year now. I can't explain
why th
Marius Bakke writes:
> I'll look into updating the remaining texlive packages shortly.
Now this was some rocket science...
The attached 9 patches updates everything (I think) to 2019.3.
The only regression I found from 'master' was that "discrover" fails to
find math fonts during the build pro
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:41:57PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Errh, the patch only works if you already have Poppler 0.83.0. For the
>> current 'core-updates' branch, I believe you can use the same approach
>> but fetch poppler-0.76.0.cc instead (or take Arch's patch[0]
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:41:57PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Errh, the patch only works if you already have Poppler 0.83.0. For the
> current 'core-updates' branch, I believe you can use the same approach
> but fetch poppler-0.76.0.cc instead (or take Arch's patch[0]).
Ah, this is rocket scien
Marius Bakke writes:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
>> I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
>> fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
>> not quite familiar with them.
>
> The 'use-code-for-new-poppler' phase needs to be rewri
Marius Bakke writes:
> Wrt the other TeX packages, I think %texlive-tag and %texlive-revision
> from (guix build-system texlive) needs to be bumped, and all the hashes
> changed accordingly.
Yes, that’s pretty much it. It’s a little tedious as so many hashes
will be invalidated at once.
Ther
Andreas Enge writes:
> I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
> fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
> not quite familiar with them.
The 'use-code-for-new-poppler' phase needs to be rewritten along these
lines (for both
I gave it a try, dropped the patches, then the phase use-code-for-new-poppler
fails for texlive-bin; maybe these poppler phases can be dropped, but I am
not quite familiar with them.
Andreas
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 08:06:19PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Ricardo, do you think you'll have time for a TeX Live 2019 update in the
> coming weeks? If not, could you outline the required changes for
> enterprising Guix contributors?
before your mail I had already tried to update the
16 matches
Mail list logo
