Alex Kost skribis:
> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-07-23 12:51 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
[...]
>>> I just wrote this because I'm almost sure that some day I will maintain
>>> emacs interface separately from Guix again. I've been regretting all
>>> the time that it became a part of Guix.
>>
Alex Kost writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-07-23 12:51 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> Pjotr Prins (2016-07-23 05:24 +0300) wrote:
>>>
Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I
did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not
>
Mathieu Lirzin (2016-07-23 12:51 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Pjotr Prins (2016-07-23 05:24 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I
>>> did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not
>>> going in.
>>>
>>> But, I s
Alex Kost writes:
> Pjotr Prins (2016-07-23 05:24 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I
>> did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not
>> going in.
>>
>> But, I suggest you listen. I know at least 4 people here who say t
Pjotr Prins (2016-07-23 05:24 +0300) wrote:
> Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I
> did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not
> going in.
>
> But, I suggest you listen. I know at least 4 people here who say they
> have trouble submittin
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:02:48PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I think I have covered that both in my writeup and in my response to
> > Ben. I think this work should be accepted as is.
>
> I find this unfair. You are not a newcomer, as proved by the fact that
> you’ve already identified wea
