Done!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>> For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a
>> lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only?
>
> It's customary to refer to Common Lisp as "lisp" only.
>
I see!
[...]
>
> Clojure is effectively a different language and won't run any
> For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a
> lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only?
It's customary to refer to Common Lisp as "lisp" only.
All package in lisp.scm are Common Lisp packages.
Clojure is effectively a different language and won't run any
Hello Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?
For femtolisp, I think we could move it if i
Hello,
Pierre Neidhardt ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov.
23., P, 10:25):
>
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?
>
I have no
Hello!
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm.
> In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure
> should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file.
>
> Thoughts?
No opinion here. What do Andy Patterson and Alex Vong thi
