Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> writes: >> For clojure, I move it from 'java.scm' to 'lisp.scm' because it is a >> lisp. But is 'lisp.scm' actually for common lisp only? > > It's customary to refer to Common Lisp as "lisp" only. > I see!
[...] > > Clojure is effectively a different language and won't run any of the packages > in > lisp.scm. This is another good reason supporting the move.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
