Hello Chris,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> Thanks for fixing this Ludo, and congratulations on the release. I'm
> glad to say that I've now managed to install GuixSD using the 0.14.0
> x86_64 ISO, however I did encounter some difficulties.
>
> I tried a few times with both the ISO you replied wi
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> I've attempted to use this to install GuixSD on a Bytemark
>> VM. Unfortunately I haven't succeeded yet. I managed to get as far as
>> running guix system init, but when I did, it started downloading the
>> bootstrap binari
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 06/12/17 at 09:14:
>> One solution would be to explicitly check build outputs for references
>> to native-inputs, and to force a build failure in that case.
I started a rudimentary PoC for this last week, after realising how bad
the situation is in ghc-* alone. We'll see w
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> 91c9b5d01 * packages: 'package-grafts' trims native inputs.
>
> [...]
>
>> Long story short: we were flagging native inputs as potential sources of
>> grafts even though, by definition, native inputs are not referred to
I wrote:
> One solution would be to explicitly check build outputs for references
> to native-inputs, and to force a build failure in that case.
More precisely, we could force a build failure when any build output
contains a reference to a component (store path) in the following set:
requisites
On 06/12/17 10:52, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
91c9b5d01 * packages: 'package-grafts' trims native inputs.
[...]
Long story short: we were flagging native inputs as potential sources of
grafts even though, by definition, native inputs are not ref
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> 91c9b5d01 * packages: 'package-grafts' trims native inputs.
[...]
> Long story short: we were flagging native inputs as potential sources of
> grafts even though, by definition, native inputs are not referred to at
> run time.
I agree that th
Thanks Ludo! But there isn't a i686 ISO :( I'll try install on my x60s. But
I'll try on may another PC using x86_64 platform.
Thanks,
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)On Dec 5, 2017 8:47 PM, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
> > I've attempted to use this to install Gui
I'll test it and report here.
Thanks,
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)On Dec 5, 2017 8:47 PM, l...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
> > I've attempted to use this to install GuixSD on a Bytemark
> > VM. Unfortunately I haven't succeeded yet. I managed to get as far as
>
Hi Chris,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> I've attempted to use this to install GuixSD on a Bytemark
> VM. Unfortunately I haven't succeeded yet. I managed to get as far as
> running guix system init, but when I did, it started downloading the
> bootstrap binaries, and then building binutils.
>
>
Hello,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> I've attempted to use this to install GuixSD on a Bytemark
> VM. Unfortunately I haven't succeeded yet. I managed to get as far as
> running guix system init, but when I did, it started downloading the
> bootstrap binaries, and then building binutils.
>
> Whe
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello there!
>
> I’ve uploaded a GuixSD installation ISO image for testing:
>
>
> http://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/guixsd-install-0.13.0.8d7f1d736.x86_64-linux.iso.xz
> SHA256: 7e04017494c419bb6ca654cff05dc7e5ba4fdfd3c2812fba9ba6d929b319e93b
>
>
> http:/
12 matches
Mail list logo
