Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-11 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:09:32PM +, Steve George wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a couple of ideas - but would need help from someone to mentor > > 1. Moldable development in Guix > Exploratory REPL experience is one of the hall-marks of 'moldable' systems. > This shortens the development cycle

Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-07 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, Ekaitz Zarraga ezt írta (időpont: 2024. márc. 7., Cs 15:16): > I have an idea too, but I don't have the knowledge to mentor it. > > guix pack support for AppImages. > Good idea. I also don't have the technical for this. Could you add it to the ideas page as draft and without mentor, so t

Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-07 Thread Steve George
Hi, I had a couple of ideas - but would need help from someone to mentor 1. Moldable development in Guix Exploratory REPL experience is one of the hall-marks of 'moldable' systems. This shortens the development cycle and improves the ability of users to explore Guix. The best REPL experience

Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-07 Thread Ekaitz Zarraga
I have an idea too, but I don't have the knowledge to mentor it. guix pack support for AppImages. On 2024-03-04 20:10, Gábor Boskovits wrote: Hello guix, I coordinated with the GNU org admins, and we can still do this round, but we have to go fast to make this happen. I have already taken the

Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-05 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Gábor Boskovits writes: > Continue rewrite build daemon in Guile Scheme > Ludovic Courtès (civodul) Since this is an ongoing NLnet project I think we should not offer it as a GSoC project this time. -- Ricardo

Re: GSoC 2024

2024-03-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
Hi Gábor, https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2024 and added a project. Feel free to modify. For the others: you can visit the older ideas pages - there is also commented out projects in some of them. If you are looking for yours. We still have a few days, but best to get it done this

Re: GSoC news

2023-05-07 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Sarthak, Sarthak Shah writes: > Hello Guix, > > Thanks for having me onboard! > I hope that my project will prove useful to Guix. > > My project is about implementing Parameterized Packages, which will add > optional Gentoo USE flag-like functionality to Guix packages. This will not > only he

Re: GSoC news

2023-05-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Sarthak, Sarthak Shah skribis: > Thanks for having me onboard! > I hope that my project will prove useful to Guix. Welcome on board!! Really happy to have you here. > My project is about implementing Parameterized Packages, which will add > optional Gentoo USE flag-like functionality to Gu

Re: GSoC news

2023-05-05 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Sarthak, On ven., 05 mai 2023 at 03:35, Sarthak Shah wrote: > Thanks for having me onboard! Welcome! > I hope that my project will prove useful to Guix. Cool! > Due to the nature of this project, it will involve taking a lot of inputs > from the Guix community, and thus you can expect a

Re: GSoC news

2023-05-04 Thread Sarthak Shah
Hello Guix, Thanks for having me onboard! I hope that my project will prove useful to Guix. My project is about implementing Parameterized Packages, which will add optional Gentoo USE flag-like functionality to Guix packages. This will not only help reduce package size but also provide users with

Re: GSoC news

2023-05-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
Welcome Sarthak! On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:22:47PM +0200, Gábor Boskovits wrote: >Hello guix, >We have some news about GSoC, the community is accepting a new intern, >Sarthak. The agreed on internship project title is Parameterized >Packages for GNU Guix. Welcome on board, and we

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-04-08 Thread Attila Lendvai
> Haven't read the Swarm thing, going more off of the general vibe of > these cryptocurrency related projects that keep popping up: > Using some kind of (optional) web of trust for clients makes more sense > to me than making people pay with cryptocurrencies. > > I should be able to set up two com

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-04-08 Thread Attila Lendvai
> Yes, it is the task of P2P storage system. Is Guix one P2P storage > solution? Or should Guix exploit already implemented P2P storage > systems? i automatically assumed the latter, because p2p storage is a non-trivial task that multiple teams are working to solve, and it's yet to be seen which

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-04-05 Thread Attila Lendvai
thanks for the detailed elaboration Maxime! prior to reading your email i was blind to the (rather obvious) fact that the current Guix servers are already run by someone (a peer), and they consume quite some resources, and it's currently financed through donations. considering this, i now find

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-04-04 Thread Maxime Devos
Op 04-04-2023 om 12:53 schreef Attila Lendvai: Onderwerp: Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage Van: Attila Lendvai Datum: 04-04-2023 12:53 Aan: Maxime Devos CC: Vijaya Anand , pukkamustard , guix-devel@gnu.org it's another question whether this mirroring shou

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-04-04 Thread Attila Lendvai
> > it's another question whether this mirroring should be enabled by default > > in the clients. probably it shouldn't, > > > It probably should -- if things aren't mirrored, then it's not p2p; you > would lose the main performance benefit of p2p systems. > > More cynically, some p2p systems (e.g

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-30 Thread Maxime Devos
Op 25-03-2023 om 20:00 schreef Attila Lendvai: welcome on board Anand! In case a user requests for a substitute and there is a missing block in the decoding process, a HTTP request for block would sent to the substitute server and the server will encode the corresponding block in real time a

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-29 Thread pukkamustard
Vijaya Anand writes: > Sorry for the late reply. > So in the case we are running swarm nodes that serves the network and hence > help fund the substitute server, we can also use these > to also upload eris encoded substitute blocks onto the network am I right? > The total cost will thus be co

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-29 Thread pukkamustard
Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > Am Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 01:49:23AM +0530 schrieb Vijaya Anand: >> In the case of accessing Guix substitutes from p2p >> network, we ensure authorization by Guix team by making sure the urn of the >> substitute is the urn mentioned in the narinfo > > no, current

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-29 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, Am Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 01:49:23AM +0530 schrieb Vijaya Anand: > In the case of accessing Guix substitutes from p2p > network, we ensure authorization by Guix team by making sure the urn of the > substitute is the urn mentioned in the narinfo no, currently substitutes are authenticated by

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-28 Thread Vijaya Anand
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. So in the case we are running swarm nodes that serves the network and hence help fund the substitute server, we can also use these to also upload eris encoded substitute blocks onto the network am I right? The total cost will thus be cost to run the swarm nodes + stor

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-26 Thread Attila Lendvai
> Also I didn't really think about the point about having to pay for > the p2p services at some point of time. a quick note here: i forgot to mention that e.g. the Swarm Foundation has programs for supporting opensource projects. so, chances are high that the storage needs for Guix would be pai

Re: [GSoC 23] distributed substitutes, cost of storage

2023-03-26 Thread Vijaya Anand
Hi Attila Thanks for the welcome! I agree that the responsibility of re-uploading the blocks back to the network should be with the clients rather than the substitute server. Also I didn't really think about the point about having to pay for the p2p services at some point of time. In this case we

Re: GSoC 2023

2023-03-14 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 18:32, Simon Tournier wrote: > and probably more in the bug > tracker. For instance, you might be interested by: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43442#9 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43442#11 as discussed in the rec

Re: GSoC 2023

2023-03-08 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 23:44, Karim Taha wrote: > Hello all, I'm Karim Taha, a senior computer engineering student at > Cairo University. I'm interested in the Guix project list for the 2023 GSoC > program. I would like to work on ' Robustify long-term support for > Reproducible Research' pr

Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Vagrant, On 2020-07-02 16:34, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2020-07-02, Brice Waegeneire wrote: To support the widest hardware and boot options possible I went with iPXE as a chainloader. Meaning that any machine doing a PXE boot (or with builtin iPXE with restricted feature set) will load

Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-07-02, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > To support the widest hardware and boot options possible I went with > iPXE > as a chainloader. Meaning that any machine doing a PXE boot (or with > builtin iPXE with restricted feature set) will load the iPXE bootloader > first, which will then properly lo

Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Brice, On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 10:11:28 + Brice Waegeneire wrote: > My issue building a static 'nfs-utils' is that it can't find > 'getrpcbynumber{,_r}' “configure: error: Neither getrpcbynumber_r nor > getrpcbynumber are available”. This function should be provided by the > libc > or by libt

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #1] Clojars importer for Guix

2020-04-15 Thread Pjotr Prins
Hi all, There are some project proposals on GNU Guix that have no mentors assigned including Leandro's. Please announce so now on GNU GSoC if you are interested. Pj. On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:47:41PM -0300, Leandro Doctors wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 01:09, Leandro Doctors wrote: > > Belo

Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network

2020-04-15 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, On 15/04/2020 20:57, Brice Waegeneire wrote: On 2020-03-30 22:10, Vincent Legoll wrote: that's a great project, I hope to be able to lend a hand, here and there... Looks like you already started by packaging iPXE. :) Thanks! That one was a "release early", but I can't promise you a

Re: iPXE network booting (was Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network)

2020-04-15 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Giovanni, On 2020-04-10 13:44, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: [...] I never used iPXE but... please consider using iPXE (if possible) for Guix network booting and consider that this feature is a prerequisite for seamless remote desktop with Guix (using x2go or xrdp like the new LTSP is doing [

Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network

2020-04-15 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Vagrant, On 2020-03-30 23:16, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: I was just thinking Guix needed network boot support yesterday! Happy to hear you're looking into it... I've been the LTSP maintainer in Debian for almost 15 years, so have a good amount of experience with network booting. LTSP was r

Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network

2020-04-15 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Vincent, On 2020-03-30 22:10, Vincent Legoll wrote: Hello, that's a great project, I hope to be able to lend a hand, here and there... Looks like you already started by packaging iPXE. :) Thanks! - Brice

Re: iPXE network booting (was Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network)

2020-04-12 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, in order to start the discussion and the project, what about the patch in [1] ? It's marked RFC as there are a few debatable points. And it can be enhanced (building the efi firmwares, etc.) [1] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40579 -- Vincent Legoll

iPXE network booting (was Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network)

2020-04-10 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hello Brice and Vagrant Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2020-03-30, Brice Waegeneire wrote: >> I know it's quite late to submit a GSOC proposal but here it's. >> I would like to work on the project suggested by Danny to >> add PXE support to Guix. Which has been requested several >> times on IRC

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Final Proposal] Clojars importer for Guix

2020-03-31 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Hi Leandro, A quick message to let you know that I'm very excited by your project! I've recently started developing with Clojure and I'd love to see a Clojars importer become reality! Good luck! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Final Proposal] Clojars importer for Guix

2020-03-31 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 15:06, Leandro Doctors wrote: > Below, I share the final version I uploaded to the GSoC website. Another bug: I didn't mention how I plan to publicly report my progress over the course of my work. Besides the normal interaction via this list, I will send (at least) three pr

Re: [GSOC 2020] Final proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Alberto EFG
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Alberto, > >> Hello, this is my final proposal for GSoC, there is still time to do >> some changes in case anyone has feedback, otherwise this is it :) > > Thank you for this thorough proposal! > > For 8.5 it would be good to provide criteria that allow us to evaluate

Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network

2020-03-30 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-03-30, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > I know it's quite late to submit a GSOC proposal but here it's. > I would like to work on the project suggested by Danny to > add PXE support to Guix. Which has been requested several > times on IRC and in the ML. This would get us a step closer > to provisi

Re: [GSOC 2020] Booting via network

2020-03-30 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, that's a great project, I hope to be able to lend a hand, here and there... -- Vincent Legoll

Re: [GSOC 2020] Final proposal

2020-03-29 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Alberto, > Hello, this is my final proposal for GSoC, there is still time to do > some changes in case anyone has feedback, otherwise this is it :) Thank you for this thorough proposal! For 8.5 it would be good to provide criteria that allow us to evaluate your progress. Being able to look

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #1] Clojars importer for Guix

2020-03-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 01:09, Leandro Doctors wrote: > Below, I share my second draft. I've just realized I haven't used the template from the GNU GSoC Guidelines page[1]... Sorry for that. I will use that template for my next draft. Best, Leandro [1]: GNU guidelines for Summer of Code projects

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #0] Initial JVM support for Guix

2020-03-23 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 14:00, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le 23 mars 2020 12:06:12 GMT-04:00, Leandro Doctors a > écrit : > >Even though I don't have data to back up this claim, in the > >Guix-Jupyter Scicloj video session [1] they mention that, in the case > >of Clojure, most packages usually incl

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #0] Initial JVM support for Guix

2020-03-23 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 23 mars 2020 12:06:12 GMT-04:00, Leandro Doctors a écrit : >On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 12:39, Julien Lepiller >wrote: > >> Hi Leandro! > >Hi, Julien, > >Thanks a lot for your feedback! I add my comments below. > > >> I'm glad you're interested in JVM languages. > >In fact, I am only interested in

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #0] Initial JVM support for Guix

2020-03-23 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 12:39, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi Leandro! Hi, Julien, Thanks a lot for your feedback! I add my comments below. > I'm glad you're interested in JVM languages. In fact, I am only interested in Clojure... However, given that Clojure is hosted on the JVM, it seems very d

Re: [GSoC 2020] [Proposal draft #0] Initial JVM support for Guix

2020-03-23 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 23 mars 2020 11:21:06 GMT-04:00, Leandro Doctors a écrit : >On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 21:41, Leandro Doctors >wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:32, zimoun >wrote: >> > Based on your interests (Clojure, Leiningen, etc.), you should >> > consider something around a Clojure "importer". >> >> I a

"Technical preview" / "Beta" features in Guix? (it was Re: [GSoC 2020] Clojure importer for Guix?)

2020-03-21 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 14:56, Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:41:05PM -0300, Leandro Doctors wrote: > > I am also checking Jelle Licht's 2016 GSoC project (the npm importer). > > From what I understand, Jelle's code was never merged back into guix. > > As I'm trying to learn from t

Re: [GSoC 2020] Clojure importer for Guix?

2020-03-21 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:41:05PM -0300, Leandro Doctors wrote: > I am also checking Jelle Licht's 2016 GSoC project (the npm importer). > From what I understand, Jelle's code was never merged back into guix. > As I'm trying to learn from the past, could anyone please ellaborate > on why was that

Re: [GSoC 2020] Clojure importer for Guix?

2020-03-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Leandro Doctors skribis: > I am preparing my proposal. I will send it in the next few days. Nice! > I am currently checking current guix importers, and their documentation. > In particular, I have been reading the source code from the Python and > Haskell importers. > > I am also checking

Re: [GSOC 2020] Introduction and asking for feedback

2020-03-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Alberto, Blackbeard skribis: > I want to apply to Google Summer of Code. The ideas I am most interested are > a) for GNU Guix: 'Content-addressed protocol for substitutes' and b) for > GNU Shepherd:  "Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd", > because I have a feeling any of th

Re: [GSOC 2020] Guix Deploy, round 2!

2020-03-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Gábor Boskovits skribis: > Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2020. márc. 8., Vas > 23:10): [...] >> What I miss the most, especially on the build farm, is the ability to >> tell ‘guix deploy’ which services to restart upon completion. >> Currently, like ‘guix system reconfigure’, it cons

Re: [GSOC 2020] Guix Deploy, round 2!

2020-03-08 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2020. márc. 8., Vas 23:10): > Hi Chris! > > Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > > > Let me also put out a goal for the Guix community: I think we'll see > > Guix Deploy as a success if a bunch of us can switch over to using it on > > our own servers (t

Re: [GSOC 2020] Guix Deploy, round 2!

2020-03-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Chris! Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > Let me also put out a goal for the Guix community: I think we'll see > Guix Deploy as a success if a bunch of us can switch over to using it on > our own servers (that includes me). To that end, I'd love to know, how > many people are doing so, or

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-03-04 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Leandro, Leandro Doctors ezt írta (időpont: 2020. márc. 3., Ke 23:45): > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:32, zimoun wrote: > > Based on your interests (Clojure, Leiningen, etc.), you should > > consider something around a Clojure "importer". (Note that I am > > ignorant about the Java ecosystem.

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-03-03 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 19:32, zimoun wrote: > Based on your interests (Clojure, Leiningen, etc.), you should > consider something around a Clojure "importer". (Note that I am > ignorant about the Java ecosystem.) Thanks for the idea, Simon! > Currently, it is possible to import Python packages f

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-03-03 Thread zimoun
Dear Leandro, On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 23:42, Leandro Doctors wrote: > I am interested in the Scheme-based ideas. (I have recently > rediscovered LISP, and I am a Clojure fan.) However, I haven't found > any indication on how to proceed in the Ideas page [1]. Elsewhere, you have been discussing a

Re: [GSOC 2020] Idea: Guile based build-tool

2020-03-03 Thread Leandro Doctors
Thanks for the link, Simon! --Leandro On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, 07:03 zimoun, wrote: > Dear, > > Perhaps, some inspiration about build systems in this paper [1] by > Haskellers. > > [1] > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/03/build-systems-final.pdf > > > All the best, > simon

Re: [GSOC 2020] Idea: Guile based build-tool

2020-03-02 Thread zimoun
Dear, Perhaps, some inspiration about build systems in this paper [1] by Haskellers. [1] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/03/build-systems-final.pdf All the best, simon

Re: [GSOC 2020] Guix Deploy, round 2!

2020-02-29 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Chris, Christopher Lemmer Webber ezt írta (időpont: 2020. febr. 29., Szo 17:55): > Hello, > > I'd be interested in doing a round 2 of mentoring for Guix Deploy. > The previous student (Jakob L. Kreuze) will not be a GSoC student this > year but is willing to co-mentor. (Maybe David Thomps

Re: [GSOC 2020] Idea: Guile based build-tool

2020-02-29 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
There have been some conversations about using Guix's tooling as a build tool in the past. Personally, what I would prefer to see is a Guile-based build tool that is standalone; an alternative for autotools basically. That then could be used *in combination with* Guix quite nicely... use the Guil

Re: [GSOC 2020] Improving the manual?

2020-02-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:39, sirgazil wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:37, zimoun wrote: >> The source of the manual lives under doc/ of what is cloned above; > The documentation is in the same repository of the guix source code (see the > doc directory). Thanks, guys. I see it now. I had

Re: [GSOC 2020] Improving the manual?

2020-02-27 Thread sirgazil
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:22:17 -0500 Leandro Doctors wrote > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 11:44, zimoun wrote: > > Are you using Guix yet? > > > > If no, the first easy step is to install the "package manager". > [...] > > Thanks for the instructions, Simon! > I have just successfull

Re: [GSOC 2020] Improving the manual?

2020-02-27 Thread zimoun
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 01:22, Leandro Doctors wrote: > > If yes, the easy way to start is: > > git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > > > from the note in the manual > > http://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html#Binary-Installation > > While cloning the

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread zimoun
Hi Leandro, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 12:54, Leandro Doctors wrote: > I will clone Guix's repo, read the code and try building it, and get > back with more specific details, if that's OK with you. Are you using Guix yet? If no, the first easy step is to install the "package manager". It works on

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 08:52, Leandro Doctors wrote: > I will clone Guix's repo, read the code and try building it, and get > back with more specific details, if that's OK with you. I checked the Guix group page [1], and found several repos... [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=guix Could

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Leandro Doctors
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 05:16, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Usually we just discuss things right here on the mailing list. That is a great starting pointer, Ricardo. Thanks! :-) > A draft for what exactly? Well, as I said before, I have only started reading the Ideas page. All I know right now is th

Re: [GSOC 2020] Discussing GNU Guix project ideas?

2020-02-27 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Leandro, > My name is Leandro Doctors. I am seriously considering applying to > GSoC 2020 with GNU Guix. Oh, that’s nice! > I am interested in the Scheme-based ideas. (I have recently > rediscovered LISP, and I am a Clojure fan.) However, I haven't found > any indication on how to proceed i

Re: GSoC 2020

2020-01-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Gábor, Gábor Boskovits skribis: > The organization application is now open for GSoC 2020. I expect that > we soon hear something from the GNU coordinator. I will keep you > updated. Thanks a lot for keeping an eye on it in addition to Outreachy! Ludo’.

Re: GSoC 2019 Recap

2019-09-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Hi Jakob, >> >> I've already said this off-list, but I feel it's worth repeating >> on-list: thank you for making "guix deploy" a reality. So many of us >> have wanted it for so long, but you did the really important

Re: GSoC 2019 Recap

2019-08-27 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Hi Jakob, > > I've already said this off-list, but I feel it's worth repeating > on-list: thank you for making "guix deploy" a reality. So many of us > have wanted it for so long, but you did the really important thing: you > put in the work, and clearly wit

Re: GSoC 2019 Recap

2019-08-21 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Hi Jakob, I've already said this off-list, but I feel it's worth repeating on-list: thank you for making "guix deploy" a reality. So many of us have wanted it for so long, but you did the really important thing: you put in the work, and clearly with great care. We're glad to have you as part of

Re: GSoC 2019

2019-01-28 Thread Björn Höfling
Hi Gábor, On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:11:04 +0100 Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Hello, > > Ludo created the GSoC ideas page for this year: > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2019 > > It is based on last year's page. There is also the Outreachy May-August 2019 period: https://www.outreachy.

Re: GSoC 2019

2019-01-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Gábor, Gábor Boskovits skribis: > Ludo created the GSoC ideas page for this year: > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2019 > > It is based on last year's page. > > I removed the Cuirass Web Interface project, as it was completed. We > can discuss a project to improve it, but tha

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-29 Thread Clément Lassieur
Gábor Boskovits writes: > P > > Clément Lassieur ezt írta (időpont: 2018. júl. 29., > V 14:01): > >> Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> >> > Hi Tatiana, >> > >> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 21:48:32 +0200 >> > Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: >> > >> >> Do you have ideas on how to >> >> implement tuple compariso

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-29 Thread Gábor Boskovits
P Clément Lassieur ezt írta (időpont: 2018. júl. 29., V 14:01): > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > > > Hi Tatiana, > > > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 21:48:32 +0200 > > Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: > > > >> Do you have ideas on how to > >> implement tuple comparison and other routines in SQL and guile in a

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-29 Thread Clément Lassieur
Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Tatiana, > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 21:48:32 +0200 > Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: > >> Do you have ideas on how to >> implement tuple comparison and other routines in SQL and guile in a >> convenient and flexible way? > > sqlite3 supports row values, so the comparison c

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-19 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
Fwiw, you can use bootstrap without js. Causal reply, Amirouche Le jeu. 19 juil. 2018 à 22:11, Tatiana Sholokhova a écrit : > Hi Clément, > > Thank you for the clarifications on the job structure! > > I have read your changes to the web interface and everything looks good to > me. Also, it wor

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-19 Thread Tatiana Sholokhova
Hi Clément, Thank you for the clarifications on the job structure! I have read your changes to the web interface and everything looks good to me. Also, it works nicely on your server. So, let's prepare for the merge. Let me know if you want me to make some fixes before the merge. In the meantime,

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-18 Thread Clément Lassieur
Hi Tatiana, Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > Could you please review the last 3 commits and maybe find some more issues > besides that? I've integrated your work onto my Cuirass instance[1], and I really like it! I had to fix a few things and adapt it[2] so that it works with multiple inputs. I w

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-18 Thread Clément Lassieur
Hi Tatiana, Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > Am I right that in terms of Cuirass database derivations correspond to > jobs? Yes, but to be more precise, a job is a structure containing: - derivation - job-name - system - nix-name - eval-id The database table called "Derivations" should b

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-18 Thread Clément Lassieur
Dear all, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Tatiana & all, > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >>> I am a bit confused about the database structure. As far as I understand, >>> there are project_name (project) and branch_name (jobset) properties, but >>> project_name is a primary key, so a project can'

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-17 Thread Clément Lassieur
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > You can download a copy of the Cuirass database as it is used on > berlin.guixsd.org, one of the build farms of the Guix project. I have > copied it here: > > http://bootstrappable.org/cuirass.db > > It is 12G(!), which indicates that Cuirass adds way too many entrie

Re: GSoC update

2018-07-12 Thread Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis
> Could you expound a bit? That’s a very short summary for all the sweat > you’ve put in it. :-) My apologies, at the time I sent the mail in a hurry. Basically now instead of converting unit files to services individually it happens in bulk so that it can check if there is a corresponding .soc

Re: GSoC update

2018-07-11 Thread Jelle Licht
2018-07-11 0:40 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Hi Ioannis, > > Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis skribis: > > > This patch adds initial support for .socket unit files. It does not > > currently work but is near completion. > > Could you expound a bit? That’s a very short summary for all the sweat > yo

Re: GSoC update

2018-07-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Ioannis, Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis skribis: > This patch adds initial support for .socket unit files. It does not > currently work but is near completion. Could you expound a bit? That’s a very short summary for all the sweat you’ve put in it. :-) Also, what is the patch against? It’s

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-08 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Tatiana Sholokhova ezt írta (időpont: 2018. júl. 8., V, 21:48): > Hello all! > > Thank you for your helpful comments and ideas! > > I've committed an improved version of the pagination. As you advised I > chose and implemented (2) variant. I alter sorting order in SQL query > depending on the ty

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-08 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Tatiana, On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 21:48:32 +0200 Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: > Do you have ideas on how to > implement tuple comparison and other routines in SQL and guile in a > convenient and flexible way? sqlite3 supports row values, so the comparison can be written like this: select * from fo

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-08 Thread Tatiana Sholokhova
Hello all! Thank you for your helpful comments and ideas! I've committed an improved version of the pagination. As you advised I chose and implemented (2) variant. I alter sorting order in SQL query depending on the type of the current page border. So, now all operators (gotofirst, gotolast, nex

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-06 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Danny Milosavljevic ezt írta (időpont: 2018. júl. 5., Cs 10:28): > Hi Tatiana, > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 22:54:46 +0200 > Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: > > > If we want to maintain a link to > > the previous page we have to filter the database table entries with to > > types of filters: one with lower

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-05 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Tatiana, On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 22:54:46 +0200 Tatiana Sholokhova wrote: > If we want to maintain a link to > the previous page we have to filter the database table entries with to > types of filters: one with lower bound on the id, and the other with the > upper bound. Yeah, I know what you me

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-04 Thread Jelle Licht
2018-07-04 22:54 GMT+02:00 Tatiana Sholokhova : > Hi all, > > Hi Tatiana, > I just committed the code I wrote trying to improve pagination. I screwed > up a bit with the new pagination. > The problem I encountered is following. If we want to maintain a link to > the previous page we have to filt

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-07-04 Thread Tatiana Sholokhova
Hi all, I just committed the code I wrote trying to improve pagination. I screwed up a bit with the new pagination. The problem I encountered is following. If we want to maintain a link to the previous page we have to filter the database table entries with to types of filters: one with lower bound

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

2018-06-29 Thread Ioannis Panagiotis Koutsidis
I am currently working on the implementation of .socket unit files, signalfd for signal handling, and fibers. It is mostly done, I just have to fix some issues that are left. On 06/25/18 13:47, boskov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, could you please send us an update on your project?

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Tatiana, Tatiana Sholokhova skribis: > On the last week, I had fallen out of the process. I had been having exams > at the university since the beginning of June. The last exam was > rescheduled and that has affected my plans. I am sorry for that. Now the > semester is finished and I am havin

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-25 Thread Tatiana Sholokhova
Hello all, On the last week, I had fallen out of the process. I had been having exams at the university since the beginning of June. The last exam was rescheduled and that has affected my plans. I am sorry for that. Now the semester is finished and I am having much more time to focus on our projec

Re: GSoC 2018 Syntax and semantics of systemd units in the Shepherd - 1st update

2018-06-25 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, could you please send us an update on your project?

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-25 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Can you please send us an update on your project?

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-13 Thread Joshua Branson
Gábor Boskovits writes: > Joshua Branson ezt írta (időpont: 2018. jún. 13., Sze > 15:52): > > Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for your reviews! > > > > I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with XHTML. > > Just cause I'm curious, why XHTM

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-13 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Joshua Branson ezt írta (időpont: 2018. jún. 13., Sze 15:52): > Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for your reviews! > > > > I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with XHTML. > > Just cause I'm curious, why XHTML instead HTML5? Is XHTML better to pa

Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface

2018-06-13 Thread Joshua Branson
Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > Hello, > > Thank you for your reviews! > > I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with XHTML. Just cause I'm curious, why XHTML instead HTML5? Is XHTML better to parse? (This question comes from non guix developer by the way. Just an enthusias

  1   2   3   4   5   >