On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep
> a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has
> been renamed.
Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for
Hi,
I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep
a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has
been renamed.
--
Ricardo
Hello,
swedebugia writes:
> Reasons:
> * shorter is better.
Not always, e.g. as you see we have a policy to prefix package names
like font-dejavu and emacs-guix, but I don't see this in ‘fuse’ case:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix package -A fuse | awk '
Reasons:
* shorter is better.
* the project it self names it sshfs.
* there are no other sshfs implementations to my knowledge
--
Cheers Swedebugia
