On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep > a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has > been renamed.
Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for an example of this.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
