Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-19 Thread Maxime Devos
Ludovic Courtès schreef op vr 01-07-2022 om 14:57 [+0200]: > Nitpick: it’s not that “the FSDG applies to Guix” but rather the Guix > project chooses to follow the FSDG (info "(guix) Software Freedom"). OOps, I searched for 'FSDG' but not for 'free software distribution guidelines' ... Greetings,

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-05 Thread Marius Bakke
Mark H Weaver skriver: > Therefore, I think that in order to comply with the FSDG, we should use > a snippet to remove any files covered by the CC BY-NC-ND license. The test suite is shipped separately from the Poppler source code, and contains many seemingly unauditable PDF files. I don't thin

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-02 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Hi, Mark's reply addresses everything that would worry me from an FSDG perspective and more -- thanks Mark! On 2022-07-01 15:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: It may also be that this qualifies as fair use (AIUI, we’re talking about pages extracted from larger PDF files, right?). ...but from a cop

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-02 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Dienstag, dem 28.06.2022 um 23:19 +0200 schrieb Marius Bakke: > Hello Guix, > > I discovered a potential freedom issue with the Poppler test suite. > [...] > So the million dollar question ... are these files okay to use for > Guix? > > In my (non-lawyer) opinion, I have faith that Poppler dev

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-01 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Ludovic and Marius, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> So the million dollar question ... are these files okay to use for Guix? >> >> In my (non-lawyer) opinion, I have faith that Poppler developers would >> not distribute files that are not freely redistributable, and that

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Marius Bakke skribis: > So the million dollar question ... are these files okay to use for Guix? > > In my (non-lawyer) opinion, I have faith that Poppler developers would > not distribute files that are not freely redistributable, and that this > counts as "non-functional data" per FSDG gui

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-07-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Maxime Devos skribis: > OTOH, the FSDG isn't mentioned anywhere in the manual, but ‘software in > Guix is free’ is, so maybe the FSDG doesn't apply. Though in past > discussions, the conclusion was that the FSDG applies to Guix, so maybe > the exceptions to the freeness policy just are in lack o

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-06-29 Thread zimoun
Hi Marius, On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 23:19, Marius Bakke wrote: > I discovered a potential freedom issue with the Poppler test suite. > Specifically it includes a file with the CC BY-NC-ND (non-commercial) > license: BY-NC-ND in short: This license allows reusers to copy and distribute th

Re: Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-06-28 Thread Maxime Devos
Marius Bakke schreef op di 28-06-2022 om 23:19 [+0200]: > I discovered a potential freedom issue with the Poppler test suite. > Specifically it includes a file with the CC BY-NC-ND (non-commercial) > license: Given that it what (some tests) are based on, this might count as functional data and hen

Non-free data in Poppler test suite

2022-06-28 Thread Marius Bakke
Hello Guix, I discovered a potential freedom issue with the Poppler test suite. Specifically it includes a file with the CC BY-NC-ND (non-commercial) license: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/test/-/commit/920c89f8f43bdfe8966c8e397e7f67f5302e9435 It turns out the repository is filled wi