Am Samstag, dem 02.04.2022 um 15:38 +0200 schrieb Bengt Richter:
> Hi Liliana, Maxime, et al,
> [...]
> Here ISTM important to understand exactly what you mean by "let-
> binding" so I would really like it if I could type
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
Hi Liliana, Maxime, et al,
On +2022-04-01 20:25:37 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 19:46 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > [...]
> > I know there have been some discussions in the past about whether
> > git-version should be used when a commit is e
Hi Maxime,
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 19:46 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> [...]
> I know there have been some discussions in the past about whether
> git-version should be used when a commit is explicitly chosen,
> whether
> tags should be used instead of commits, how high a risk there is that
>-- would the commit need to be let-bound here?
You seem to already know the answer, which is 'no'.
Aside, 'let-binding' is not the opposite of 'hard-coding'.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 01-04-2022 om 19:03 [+0200]:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> [...]
> >
> > -- would the commit need to be let-bound here?
> This discussion has already been had elsewhere, but to reiterate, my
> reasoning is that if you can't trust upstream tags to remain valid, you
> need an
Hi Maxime,
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 08:30 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 01-04-2022 om 06:14 [+0200]:
> > It won't be added to Guix. Here's why it won't.
> > You appear to believe that
> > [...]
> > [ ] hard-coding the commit field is a good idea
>
> Does
ikler"
wrote:
> Dear reviewer,
>
> in the sequel find the new review checklist, effective immediately.
> Failure to apply it will result in the confiscation of your machine for
> the purpose of making it usable for continuous integration.
>
> Happy April Fools
>
>
Dear Liliana,
On 2022-04-01 04:14, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
in the sequel find the new review checklist, effective immediately.
Failure to apply it will result in the confiscation of your machine for
the purpose of making it usable for continuous integration.
The last patch I submitted
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 01-04-2022 om 06:14 [+0200]:
> It won't be added to Guix. Here's why it won't.
> You appear to believe that
> [...]
> [ ] hard-coding the commit field is a good idea
Does the following count:
(define-public foo
(package
(name "foo")
(version "1.0.0")
Dear reviewer,
in the sequel find the new review checklist, effective immediately.
Failure to apply it will result in the confiscation of your machine for
the purpose of making it usable for continuous integration.
Happy April Fools
-
So you want to package a
[ ] C [ ] C++ [ ] C
10 matches
Mail list logo
