Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 01-04-2022 om 06:14 [+0200]: > It won't be added to Guix. Here's why it won't. > You appear to believe that > [...] > [ ] hard-coding the commit field is a good idea
Does the following count:
(define-public foo
(package
(name "foo")
(version "1.0.0")
(source
(origin
[...]
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
;; Upstream does not tag versions, see
;; <https://foo.bar/versions> for which commit
;; corresponds to which version.
;;
;; (alternatively)
;;
;; Upstream deletes old tags every N months,
;; so explicitly write the commit here.;
;;
;; (alternatively)
;;
;; There is consensus that the benefits of explicit commits
;; outweigh the downsides, see
;; <https://actually.I.dont.think.there.is.consensus?>
(commit "cabba9e..."))
[...]))
-- would the commit need to be let-bound here?
Greetings,
Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
