Re: Licensing question about Pale Moon Browser binary distribution

Hi! You've read the exception point correctly: Using New Moon (=unofficial) branding, you are allowed to do whatever you wish with your distribution, including reconfiguration, different home page, etc. Go right ahead! If you make source code changes, you should also supply your modified source c

Re: Licensing question about Pale Moon Browser binary distribution

Hi, On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Moonchild wrote: > Hi! > > You've read the exception point correctly: > > Using New Moon (=unofficial) branding, you are allowed to do whatever > you wish with your distribution, including reconfiguration, different > home page, etc. Go right ahead! > If you make source c

Licensing question about Pale Moon Browser binary distribution

Hello licensing team of Pale Moon, a long time ago I packaged Pale Moon in the Newmoon flavor (or "brand") for GNU Guix. I have maintained it in my local set of repositories for some time now, simply because of your redistribution policies (http://www.palemoon.org/redist.shtml). It is building fro