Hi, On Sun, 04 Feb 2018, Moonchild <moonch...@palemoon.org> wrote: > Hi! > > You've read the exception point correctly: > > Using New Moon (=unofficial) branding, you are allowed to do whatever > you wish with your distribution, including reconfiguration, different > home page, etc. Go right ahead! > If you make source code changes, you should also supply your modified > source code to stay within the requirements of the MPL source code license. > > Moonchild.
Alright then. I should've asked this question earlier. Better late than never. Thanks for your reply! > On 04/02/2018 12:58, n...@n0.is wrote: > >>>From re-reading item 12: >> >>> Unofficial branding ("New Moon") as supplied in the source code >>> may be used for unendorsed binaries at all times. Thusly >>> branded binaries with the New Moon logo and product name are >>> not subject to the endorsement and exception rules as set out >>> in previous points of this license and may be freely >>> distributed in altered or unaltered form, subject to the >>> Mozilla Public License as regards source code changes and >>> availability. This permission does, however, not include any >>> rights or license to the Pale Moon name and logo that may still >>> be present in the resulting unofficially branded binaries. >> >> in the above mentioned policy I understand that we will be >> allowed to distribute the resulting binaries. Is my understanding >> of your policy exception correct or did I miss anything? >> >> Regards, >> ng0 >> > > -- ng0 :: https://ea.n0.is A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 :: https://ea.n0.is/keys/