Hello,
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> I don't know what we are currently doing to get the installer iso image
> sized down, but I caught some discussion yesterday on irc, that the image
> is actually very well compressible, and checking the sizes it really is.
>
> Might that be possible to do someth
Manolis Ragkousis transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/08/2017 10:37 AM, ng0 wrote:
> > So why focus on the artifical size of optical disks, especially a
> > format that has been considered old by most if not all other distros
> > above the size of tiny distros?
> >
> > If this may sound li
Hello,
On 12/08/2017 10:37 AM, ng0 wrote:
> So why focus on the artifical size of optical disks, especially a
> format that has been considered old by most if not all other distros
> above the size of tiny distros?
>
> If this may sound like harsh criticism: I'm only curious.
>
2 things come to
ng0 transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> Gábor Boskovits transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> > I don't know what we are currently doing to get the installer iso image
> > sized down, but I caught some discussion yesterday on irc, that the image
> > is actually very well compressible, and checking the sizes it really is
Gábor Boskovits transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> I don't know what we are currently doing to get the installer iso image
> sized down, but I caught some discussion yesterday on irc, that the image
> is actually very well compressible, and checking the sizes it really is.
>
> Might that be possible to do
I don't know what we are currently doing to get the installer iso image
sized down, but I caught some discussion yesterday on irc, that the image
is actually very well compressible, and checking the sizes it really is.
Might that be possible to do something like compressing the root filesystem
ima
