Re: Can't build openjdk:jdk 16 and above on aarch64 without hitting TasksMax

2024-08-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
"Brennan Vincent" skribis: > I should have mentioned that I'm on a foreign distro (Fedora). Which if > I correctly understand how things work means I'm not using the Shepherd > at all. Is the patch you linked relevant anyway? [...] >> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/30948 Yes: the bug in questio

Re: Can't build openjdk:jdk 16 and above on aarch64 without hitting TasksMax

2024-08-29 Thread Brennan Vincent
I should have mentioned that I'm on a foreign distro (Fedora). Which if I correctly understand how things work means I'm not using the Shepherd at all. Is the patch you linked relevant anyway? Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > "Brennan Vincent" skribis: > >> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht

Re: Can't build openjdk:jdk 16 and above on aarch64 without hitting TasksMax

2024-08-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, "Brennan Vincent" skribis: > See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-04/msg00608.html > for historical context. > > I have to bump this value locally in order to build openjdk@16:jdk > because the build requires more than 1 PIDs. > > Perusing the output of ps suggests that

Re: Can't build openjdk:jdk 16 and above on aarch64 without hitting TasksMax

2024-08-26 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Brennan, On Sun, Aug 25 2024, Brennan Vincent wrote: > the build process is leaking a huge number of unreaped bash > processes. The number keeps growing monotonically Sounds like a functional programmer at work! Kind regards Felix

Can't build openjdk:jdk 16 and above on aarch64 without hitting TasksMax

2024-08-25 Thread Brennan Vincent
See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-04/msg00608.html for historical context. I have to bump this value locally in order to build openjdk@16:jdk because the build requires more than 1 PIDs. Perusing the output of ps suggests that the build process is leaking a huge number of