On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:59:46AM +0100, dan...@friendly-machines.com wrote:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> > Could you please either revert this commit or merge the two 'dlib'
> > definitions, assuming the upgrade does not break any dependent? (You
> > can use 'guix build -P1 dlib' for example to check that.)
Hi Ludo,
Could you please either revert this commit or merge the two 'dlib'
definitions, assuming the upgrade does not break any dependent? (You
can use 'guix build -P1 dlib' for example to check that.)
I've merged them now and checked the only 3 dependents, starting with
python-openturns and
Hey Danny,
dan...@friendly-machines.com skribis:
> I've merged them now and checked the only 3 dependents, starting with
> python-openturns and the rest being in guix-hpc: they still do the
> same not-that-great stuff that they did before (since the python
> bindings are not enabled in dlib and w
Hi Danny,
guix-comm...@gnu.org skribis:
> commit 6cd15c83ab54b049f4bd3114ba971849ffe1fe66
> Author: Danny Milosavljevic
> AuthorDate: Mon Feb 3 12:54:34 2025 +0100
>
> gnu: Add dlib.
>
> * gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm (dlib): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Id0240565dfe76
