Marius Bakke skribis:
> * gnu/packages/disk.scm (dosfstools/static): New private variable.
> (fatfsck/static): New variable.
You could add “#:allowed-references ()” in ‘fatfsck/static’ to make sure
it doesn’t retain references to anything else.
> +(description "This package provides a stati
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 05.11.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Marius Bakke:
>> +(define-public fatfsck/static
>> + (package
>> +(name "fatfsck-static")
>
> What is the reason for using a different name in "define"?
I mostly followed the convention of the e2fsck package. I've seen this
convention
Am 05.11.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Marius Bakke:
> +(define-public fatfsck/static
> + (package
> +(name "fatfsck-static")
What is the reason for using a different name in "define"?
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-co
* gnu/packages/disk.scm (dosfstools/static): New private variable.
(fatfsck/static): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/disk.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/disk.scm b/gnu/packages/disk.scm
index db050d6..477c25a 100644
--- a/g
