Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> writes: > Am 05.11.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Marius Bakke: >> +(define-public fatfsck/static >> + (package >> + (name "fatfsck-static") > > What is the reason for using a different name in "define"?
I mostly followed the convention of the e2fsck package. I've seen this convention elsewhere as well, but don't know the reasoning behind it :) However fatfsck could perhaps be renamed to dosfsck to better match the e2fsprogs->e2fsck transformation.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
