On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:10:02PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:33:25AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> >
> > > Leo Famulari writes:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:33:25AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
> > Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
> >>> Leo Famulari wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I think it would be bette
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
>>> Leo Famulari wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
>>> > music.scm.
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:08:49AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
> >> Leo Famulari wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to b
Ricardo Wurmus (2015-12-29 10:08 +0300) wrote:
> Grouping packages in modules also allows user interfaces like guix-web
> to narrow results to just a single module. For example, searching for
> “bioinfo” in guix-web shows me everything from the “bioinformatics.scm”
> module, even though not all p
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
>> Leo Famulari wrote:
>>
>> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
>> > music.scm.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> IIRC, the original thought was
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
> Leo Famulari wrote:
>
> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
> > music.scm.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their o
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
> music.scm.
>
> Thoughts?
IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their own
modules, so this was done for cursynth as well.
> Leo Famulari (1):
> gnu
I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
music.scm.
Thoughts?
Leo Famulari (1):
gnu: Move cursynth to (gnu packages music).
gnu-system.am | 1 -
gnu/packages/cursynth.scm | 53 ---
gnu/packages/music.scm| 27