On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500 > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> wrote: > > > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in > > music.scm. > > > > Thoughts? > > IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their own > modules, so this was done for cursynth as well.
Okay, sure. To be honest, I don't understand the reasoning behind grouping packages into modules. Is it just for humans or is there some technical reason for it? > > > Leo Famulari (1): > > gnu: Move cursynth to (gnu packages music). > > > > gnu-system.am | 1 - > > gnu/packages/cursynth.scm | 53 > > ----------------------------------------------- > > gnu/packages/music.scm | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/cursynth.scm > > >
