On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 05:00:58PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> I can't see any evidence to the contrary. I also ran a compatibility checker
> and it seemed to work out (while 2.3.2 vs 2.2.6 did not, as a negative
> control).
> https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker/
>
> I'm not quite finis
On 20/11/16 01:28, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:32:09AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
* gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby)[replacement]: New field.
(ruby-2.3.2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/pac
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:32:09AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby)[replacement]: New field.
> (ruby-2.3.2): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 20
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/
* gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby)[replacement]: New field.
(ruby-2.3.2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
index e4c1ef0..f2b5de9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
+++ b/gnu/