On 20/11/16 01:28, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:32:09AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
* gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby)[replacement]: New field.
(ruby-2.3.2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
index e4c1ef0..f2b5de9 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
(define-public ruby
(package
(name "ruby")
+ (replacement ruby-2.3.2)
Remember that grafted replacements should have a compatible ABI.
This is the first result I found when searching for "Ruby ABI compatible"
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/12/21/ruby-version-policy-changes-with-2-1-0/
So, if they've kept that policy, this should be fine.
I can't see any evidence to the contrary. I also ran a compatibility
checker and it seemed to work out (while 2.3.2 vs 2.2.6 did not, as a
negative control).
https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker/
I'm not quite finished packaging it yet up to standard just yet, but I
pushed what I have here, in case it is useful in the meantime.
https://github.com/wwood/guix_mine/blob/master/ben/packages/local.scm
I pushed the graft to master and updated it directly on staging.
ben
