Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
Andreas Enge writes: > All in all, I think that all three package names "gambc", "gambit" and > "gambit-c" are defendable. "Gambit" would have been best I guess but then there's another program of that name, , which is probably the reason package r

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Andreas Enge
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:30:31PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Where is this documented? I looked for it in the "Packaging Guidelines" > section of our manual, and also the subsection "Package Naming", and > couldn't find it. Anyway, even if such a guideline were documented, I > would oppose it

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:23:32AM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: >> FYI I already pushed it as gambit-c. > > I saw it just after sending my own message. > >> Tell me if you want me to push a patch to change it. > > I think it would be nice to be consistent, s

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Andreas Enge
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:23:32AM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: > FYI I already pushed it as gambit-c. I saw it just after sending my own message. > Tell me if you want me to push a patch to change it. I think it would be nice to be consistent, so yes, please. Andreas

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:57:49PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> I think the name of the package and variable should be 'gambit-c'. I >> know that Debian calls it 'gambc', but Parabola and Fedora both call it >> 'gambit-c', and IMO that's much more readable. >

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-17 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:57:49PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I think the name of the package and variable should be 'gambit-c'. I > know that Debian calls it 'gambc', but Parabola and Fedora both call it > 'gambit-c', and IMO that's much more readable. according to the packaging guide

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-16 Thread Mark H Weaver
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes: > From 81fdfe2ef50f0cb9f92ae4d913e9d1705926b3ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?= > > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:29:36 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH]

[PATCH] gnu: Add gambc.

2015-02-16 Thread Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
>From 81fdfe2ef50f0cb9f92ae4d913e9d1705926b3ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?= Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:29:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gambc. * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (gambc): New variable. --- gnu/packages/scheme.scm |