Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > All in all, I think that all three package names "gambc", "gambit" and > "gambit-c" are defendable.
"Gambit" would have been best I guess but then there's another program of that name, <https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/math/gambit>, which is probably the reason package repositories call it gambc or gambit-c. > We may follow the path of lowest resistance and keep the name as it is > now. OK, leaving it as is then. :-) Taylan
