Nils Gillmann skribis:
> From 8cc2f10b46840096039d75b4edc910ad2cbbb274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 17:26:21 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add font-un.
>
> * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-un): New variable.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
okay, fixed it.
>From 8cc2f10b46840096039d75b4edc910ad2cbbb274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 17:26:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add font-un.
* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-un): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 72 +
Andreas Enge writes:
> A bit odd indeed, but okay, I think. I would either go with "font-un" and put
> everything into it (or keep just the core part and drop the extra part, as you
> wish), or "font-un-core" and "font-un-extra" (in two packages,
> for instance).
for now I go with font-un and la
Nils Gillmann writes:
Appendum: Should fix the errors lint found.
I know too little texinfo markup, why is that wrong? the period,
okay I can see that now.
~/projects/guix_project/guix $ ./pre-inst-env guix build font-un
substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'http://hydra.gnu.org'... 10
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 05:17:59PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Okay, sounds odd but reasonable. But what about un-fonts-core and
> un-fonts-extra, if I add -extra (see packages.gentoo.org for
> example), with this naming scheme it should be then font-un
> which gets separated into font-un:core an
added correction and renamed package according to what I
described and submitted in the messages in this thread.
>From a473a240fbea1ef6bd4bd2aeab1f5244c64ae385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 17:26:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add font-un.
* gnu/packages/font
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > +(name "font-un-fonts")
>> Shouldn’t it be “font-un-fonts-core” since that’s what the tarball is
>> called?
>
> I just read up on our font naming guidelines in the manual:
> "The name of a package con
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>
>> I made the file being served from sdf.org available on
>> krosos.sdf.org/static/unix/ and as soon as I get the okay from
>> any other location (potentially in-berlin.de) I will change the
>> location. Sdf.org is really permanent
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > +(name "font-un-fonts")
> Shouldn’t it be “font-un-fonts-core” since that’s what the tarball is
> called?
I just read up on our font naming guidelines in the manual:
"The name of a package containing only one font family star
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> I made the file being served from sdf.org available on
> krosos.sdf.org/static/unix/ and as soon as I get the okay from
> any other location (potentially in-berlin.de) I will change the
> location. Sdf.org is really permanent, but I prefer to move it to
> a place which co
This adds the fontset un-fonts and closes the old thread on it.
I made the file being served from sdf.org available on
krosos.sdf.org/static/unix/ and as soon as I get the okay from
any other location (potentially in-berlin.de) I will change the
location. Sdf.org is really permanent, but I prefer
11 matches
Mail list logo
