l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Nils Gillmann <niaster...@grrlz.net> skribis: > >> I made the file being served from sdf.org available on >> krosos.sdf.org/static/unix/ and as soon as I get the okay from >> any other location (potentially in-berlin.de) I will change the >> location. Sdf.org is really permanent, but I prefer to move it to >> a place which could serve it via tls. >> >> From 2dcb24a8ea630311743bc8b661c57db0ffcb5be9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Nils Gillmann <niaster...@grrlz.net> >> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 23:04:16 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add un-fonts. >> >> * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-un-fonts): New variable. > > [...] > >> + ;; origin server is serving us broken MIME > > s/origin server/The upstream server at kldp.net/ plus period at the > end. :-) Also please add “See <http://bugs.gnu.org/22908>.” so we can > revisit this issue when the bug is fixed. > >> + (name "font-un-fonts") > > Shouldn’t it be “font-un-fonts-core” since that’s what the tarball is > called?
Possibly, yes. There's also un-fonts-extra in gentoo which is puzzled together from gnu:// and one other mirror. un-fonts-extra is not on kldp.net. I will rename the package to font-un-fonts-core > This should be “1.0.2-080608” IMO since this is what upstream calls it. > okay > Might be best to write: > > (uri (list (string-append > "http://krosos.sdf.org"; …) > > ;; XXX: The upstream server at kldp.net bla bla… > (string-append > "http://kldp.net/"…))) > > That way, we keep the upstream URL around. > >> + (description >> + "Un-fonts is a family of mainly Korean fonts. >> +It contains the following fonts and styles: >> + >> +UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif >> +UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif >> +UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style >> +UnDinaru, UnDinaruBold, UnDinaruLight >> +UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script >> +UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke > > Use @enumerate and @item for the list. >> + ;; GPL + embed exception for documents / images >> + (license license:gpl2+))) > > ‘README’ does not mention an “embedding exception” so I think the > comment is erroneous, or am I missing something? Indeed, and this is the issues I have too and would have submitted it as GPL too, if it wasn't for the following. I am not capable of reading the kldp.net website (at the time of writing), but rekado seems to be. quote from earlier conversation: "" Upstream[1] says this about the license: "" "" 2 저작권 "" "" 은글꼴의 저작권은 GPL + (문서/이미지에 대한)embed 예외 조항이 포함되어 "" 은글꼴을 사용한 출판 및 디자인에 대해 상업용,비상업용 목적으로 "" 사용하는 데에 아무런 문제가 없습니다. "" "" [1]: http://kldp.net/projects/unfonts "" "" If I understand correctly, this means that the fonts are released under "" GPL + embed exception (for documents / images). README.Debian seems to "" be outdated. The upstream note is from 2012/12/29. "" "" ~~ Ricardo "" "" " " Oh, that's good news, thanks. " As (license:) for the package, is it still gpl2 or is this GPL + " something I could find in fonts.scm ? I did not see any restriction to a particular version of the GPL, but I didn’t look very carefully. If no particular version is mentioned you can just use “gpl3+” (because “GPL” means “any version of the GPL”). Add the embed exception in a comment above the license field. I do suggest you check the sources once more, though. Just grep for “GPL” and see if they mention the GPL version. ~~ Ricardo "" end quote. Somebody in the older thread of the unfonts mentioned that it should be gpl2+, so maybe someone could read into that again and figure out if 2 or 3 applies? Thanks for the input, -- ng irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/ EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en
