Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-12 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Eric Bavier skribis: > >> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). >> What do others think? > > +1 Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a hom

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this >>> because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a home as >>> well. What do you think? >> >> I like (gnu packages music) too, and

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-10 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this >> because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a home as >> well. What do you think? > > I like (gnu packages music) too, and it makes sense to group LilyPond,

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Eric Bavier skribis: >> >>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). >>> What do others think? >> >> +1 > > Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this > because there are other pa

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Eric Bavier skribis: > I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). > What do others think? +1

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Eric Bavier
On 2015-03-09 16:06, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Andreas Enge writes: On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What do others think? How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? score.scm?

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Andreas Enge writes: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: >> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What do >> others think? > > How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? score.scm? I would prefer music.scm, so that also

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Andreas Enge
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What do > others think? How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? score.scm? Andreas

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Mark H Weaver
Eric Bavier writes: > I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). > What do others think? Agreed. Mark

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Eric Bavier
On 2015-03-08 09:12, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: * gnu/packages/audio.scm (lilypond): New variable. Thanks for this! I've wanted to package lilypond for quite some time, but got distracted with other things after doing fontforge and dblatex ;) I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packag

Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Eric Bavier writes: > I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What > do others think? I do agree. I didn't like to put it in the audio module, because it doesn't really have much in common with the other packages there. I would prefer to move it to another module, i

[PATCH] Add Lilypond.

2015-03-08 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
>From 0442929caf91c1efcc495d9220b2739a8e05fa57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:36:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lilypond. * gnu/packages/audio.scm (lilypond): New variable. --- gnu/packages/audio.scm | 76 +++