l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Eric Bavier skribis:
>
>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).
>> What do others think?
>
> +1
Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this
because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a hom
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this
>>> because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a home as
>>> well. What do you think?
>>
>> I like (gnu packages music) too, and
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this
>> because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a home as
>> well. What do you think?
>
> I like (gnu packages music) too, and it makes sense to group LilyPond,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Eric Bavier skribis:
>>
>>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).
>>> What do others think?
>>
>> +1
>
> Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this
> because there are other pa
Eric Bavier skribis:
> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).
> What do others think?
+1
On 2015-03-09 16:06, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Andreas Enge writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).
What do
others think?
How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm?
score.scm?
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What do
>> others think?
>
> How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? score.scm?
I would prefer music.scm, so that also
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What do
> others think?
How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? score.scm?
Andreas
Eric Bavier writes:
> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).
> What do others think?
Agreed.
Mark
On 2015-03-08 09:12, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
* gnu/packages/audio.scm (lilypond): New variable.
Thanks for this! I've wanted to package lilypond for quite some time,
but got distracted with other things after doing fontforge and dblatex
;)
I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packag
Eric Bavier writes:
> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). What
> do others think?
I do agree. I didn't like to put it in the audio module, because it
doesn't really have much in common with the other packages there. I
would prefer to move it to another module, i
>From 0442929caf91c1efcc495d9220b2739a8e05fa57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:36:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lilypond.
* gnu/packages/audio.scm (lilypond): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/audio.scm | 76 +++
12 matches
Mail list logo