Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Eric Bavier <bav...@member.fsf.org> skribis: >> >>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond). >>> What do others think? >> >> +1 > > Since then, (gnu packages music) has been suggested. I like this > because there are other packages like Denemo that will need a home as > well. What do you think?
I like (gnu packages music) too, and it makes sense to group LilyPond, Denemo, et al. (Inappropriate mail processing on my side, sorry!) Ludo’.
