[PATCH] gnu: Add tree-sitter-heex.

2023-03-23 Thread ivan-p-sokolov
gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm (tree-sitter-heex): New variable. --- gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm b/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm index 8dda7737ca..b91345bb36 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/tree-sitter.scm +++ b/gnu/pa

Re: Get abrowser into Guix?

2022-09-21 Thread Jorge P . de Morais Neto
Hi. I reply below the citation: Em [2022-09-21 qua 14:49:27+], kiasoc5 escreveu: > There was talk a while ago about getting abrowser [1] into Guix [2]. > > Since IceCat and Firefox are now pretty close to each other in major > version (104 vs 105), now could be a good time to get abrowser in

Re: Why do Emacs packages still pull emacs-transient?

2022-07-08 Thread Jorge P . de Morais Neto
Hi Maxim! Em [2022-07-06 qua 09:35:28-0400], Maxim Cournoyer escreveu: > I guess it's simply an oversight. Could you try to removing it from the > affected packages and see if they still byte compile and run happily? > If they do, a patch would be welcome. I have just sent the patch to guix-pat

Re: Why do Emacs packages still pull emacs-transient?

2022-07-06 Thread Jorge P . de Morais Neto
Hi! I apologize for the delay and reply below: Em [2022-07-04 seg 14:41:06+0200], zimoun escreveu: > Which are the Emacs packages you are using without an explicit mention > to emacs-transient? I have modified the recipes (removing the dependency on emacs-transient) of the following four packag

Why do Emacs packages still pull emacs-transient?

2022-07-04 Thread Jorge P. de Morais Neto
Hi. To begin, thank you for your work on GNU! I use Guix package manager (manually installed) atop Debian bullseye. My Emacs is from Guix package emacs-next with a package transformation option to pull from current Git master. When I tried to use the new emoji commands on the "C-x 8e" prefix, I

Re: Installing packages auto-container'ed

2020-07-02 Thread L p R n d n
er code in (guix pack). Also I tried to make a variant for softwares needing FHS (binaries, really...). Would it be possible/interesting to get that kind of feature too? And +1 too for the command-line option. :) Have a nice day, L p R n d n

Re: https://guix.gnu.org/packages ?

2020-05-07 Thread L p R n d n
it with a pinch of salt... Have a nice day, L p R n d n

Re: Parameterized packages

2020-01-17 Thread L p R n d n
ctly without introducing new syntax: (xorg (package (inherit xorg) ... Then givin a list of packages, apply a modificator to it and get a modified list of packages? Hope it helps, Have a nice day, L p R n d n

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-12-11 Thread YOANN P
> Hi Yoann, Hi Ludo, > I had not understood that.  I guess the patch below fixes it, I’ll push > t shortly. > Thanks, > Ludo’. Look great, but IMO, your addition, "(passwd:name (getpwuid (getuid", should be the only way to get the username since $USER and $LOGNAME could be overridden or uns

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-12-02 Thread YOANN P
> > > As said, it is not a bug of "guix pull" but a bug of the > > > configuration. Adding the root user to your Dockerfile should fix the > > > issue you encounter. > > > > The fact that guix require $USER to be set is IMO a kind of bug and is > > documented anywhere. > I do not understand: runni

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-29 Thread YOANN P
> It is similar to Bug#36785 [1]. > As said, it is not a bug of "guix pull" but a bug of the > configuration. Adding the root user to your Dockerfile should fix the > issue you encounter. The fact that guix require $USER to be set is IMO a kind of bug and is documented anywhere. It will be less p

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-24 Thread YOANN P
> Like Julien, I find it surprising: where does that “default” come from? > Did you mean “/per-user/default” or really “/default”?  If the latter, > something’s really fishy.  :-) > Ludo’. Hi ludo, I provided a reproducible case with how i arrive at this "weird" state in a previous email. But to

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-21 Thread YOANN P
> Other said, how can I reproduce the behaviour you are observing? # Download requirements $ mkdir -p /tmp/guix-docker $ wget -O /tmp/guix-docker/Dockerfile https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rockandska/.dotfiles/084b3c6924eeb985cb40edfc90e3827b10ba61e2/.local/opt/dotfiles-bootstrap/te

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-20 Thread YOANN P
> Is default a username or the value of $USER maybe? @julien : default is not the name of any user, only root and guix-build users are present under my container > To delete old generations, use `guix system delete-generations`, for > packages, use `guix package` with flag `delete-generations`.

RE: guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-20 Thread YOANN P
After re-reading the doc for 'guix gc', i now know why. It seems that guix pull doesn't change the symlink in /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix and is list in gc roots /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix --> current-guix-1-link --> /gnu/store/rrhs9c8k0vbpirqplfzh2bf1xczr3z

guix gc doesn't seem to clean old guix revision

2019-11-19 Thread YOANN P
Hi guix, I was testing the creation of guix docker image to be able to have multiple versions : - 1.0.1 ( based on binary installation ) - latest ( based on the last commit from guix git with git pull ) - commit_hash ( specific commit ) And what i observed is it seems that 'guix gc' doesn't cle

Re: Publishing news about Guix on a weekly basis

2019-11-04 Thread L p R n d n
it could be a handy way for users to pull from a recent commit, yet with (probably) substitutes. What do you think? Have a nice day L p r n d n

Re: Stateful system directories

2019-10-18 Thread P
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, October 18, 2019 10:05 AM, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > "[...] the underlying bug is a missing distinction between configuration > and state upstream…" See also the numerous programs that treat ~/.config like it was al

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-10-15 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:27 PM, Gavin Smith wrote: > WebKitGTK seemed to be the best option for a lightweight embedded > web-browser. I looked into other options, such as the Gecko engine > used inside Thunderbird, but apparently it is not supported any more

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 7:09 PM, wrote: > Can everyone move this discussion elsewhere? Seeing that this is not > related to the GNU system or Guix. I resisted replying for a few days, hoping that the moderators would lock people like Louis out and the thre

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 7:04 PM, Wilson Bustos wrote: >>> Language changes. Get over it. > > Actually the spanish language has not changed in that sent. > No one talks in 'political correctness spanish' or in 'feminist spanish'. > So you are not writing span

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 6:54 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > No fact there, just rumor. Very well, then your claim that you do not discriminate in your hiring practices is also not a fact, merely a rumor. You do not seem to judge feminists by the same scale as yo

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 6:27 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > - P pron...@protonmail.com [2019-10-12 20:03]: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:53 PM, Jean Louis bugs@gnu.support wrote: > > > >

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 6:24 PM, Wilson Bustos wrote: > Change a language's rules to fit your politics because you feel the normal > language is offensive,is actually extreme. > All the best, Language changes. Get over it.

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 6:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > - P pron...@protonmail.com [2019-10-12 20:00]: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:46 PM, Wilson Bustos wrbut...@gmail.com > > wrote: &

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:53 PM, Jean Louis bugs@gnu.support wrote: > > > When you have reviewed the facts and not just blindly respond back > > with your emotional reaction, let me know, as I like exchanging on > > true facts, not emotional or political r

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:53 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > When you have reviewed the facts and not just blindly respond back > with your emotional reaction, let me know, as I like exchanging on > true facts, not emotional or political responses. > > Jean Have yo

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:46 PM, Wilson Bustos wrote: > Don't you think that is extreme? I do not. What's extreme is that you feel like such a tiny thing is extreme. Quit your whining or find a new hobby.

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:36 PM, wrote: > But we cannot take off somebody's rights on his own organization like GNU and > so on. > znavko. It's not "his own organization". He can remain a contributor but he shouldn't remain any kind of chief.

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-12 Thread P
On Saturday, October 12, 2019 5:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > - František Kučera konfere...@frantovo.cz [2019-10-12 19:13]: > > > Dne 12. 10. 19 v 15:38 pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) napsal(a): > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:06:31PM +0200, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > > > > Ludovic Courtès and And

[completion] Completion scripts not loaded from ~/.guix-profile/etc/profile

2019-10-11 Thread YOANN P
Hi guix, Not sure if it needs to be add to the guix documentation or directly included in "~/.guix-profile/etc/profile" generation process, but the completion scripts provided by packages seem not to be loaded. For example, if i only install the package "git", the completion scripts for "git" r

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-10 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, October 10, 2019 7:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If you > > don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss, which is the > > appropriate mailing list. > > I don't mind. > > Guix

Re: GNU Guix maintainer collective expands

2019-10-10 Thread L p R n d n
Congratulation everybody! It's good news for sure! Have a lovely day, L p r n d n

Re: Matt, here is kind question to provide facts on your statements about RMS

2019-10-09 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 6:25 AM, Jean Louis wrote: > From: > Mr. Jean Louis > Nagpur, India > Day 3 of week 41 of 2019 > > Hello there, Stop spamming the list. Thanks.

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-08 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:38 PM, Dimakakos Dimos wrote: > Do we have evidence that rms has caused harm to GNU's projects? in short: yes. lots of people have talked about this, but here is one thread I've seen recently: https://pleroma.site/notice/9nh9bWH6R

Re: WIP Guix Cookbook

2019-09-08 Thread L p R n d n
don't have any preference for the narrator voice. Have a nice day, L p R n d n

Re: Idris packaging

2019-08-22 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 22, 2019 3:10 PM, Eric Bavier wrote: > Could you detail a simple reproducer? E.g. attach the idris code, detail your > environment, and a simple walkthrough of the commands to reach the linker > error you're seeing? That would help others hel

Re: Idris packaging

2019-08-21 Thread P
On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 3:54 PM, Eric Bavier wrote: > I've been able to compile Idris' generated C code by setting the, rather > undocumented, IDRIS_CC environment variable, while having the 'gcc-toolchain' > package installed. > > I have not worked much with Idris modules, so I've not e

Re: Idris packaging

2019-08-19 Thread P
There is a different issue as well, which is that Idris can't seem to compile anything. I've been trying to get gcc or clang to work with the C code Idris generates but somehow even a simple hello world runs into a linker error where ld can't find crt1.o and crti.o even though they are on its pa

Idris packaging

2019-08-19 Thread P
I ran across an idiosyncrasy in Idris's module system, it looks like `IDRIS_LIBRARY_PATH` is not a list of colon separated paths but a single path, but it supports multiple source and binary paths with the `--sourcepath` option. Currently this breaks `guix environment` if Idris is installed in t

Re: Is there a way to upgrade only packages with substitutes?

2019-08-04 Thread P
> This option will update only packages with substitutes and very small > packages without substitutes (if they compile quickly). And it will not > update big packages without substitutes. Realization of it we cannot assume. How can you know what compiles quickly? Stats based on previous version

Re: Is there a way to upgrade only packages with substitutes?

2019-08-03 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, zna...@disroot.org writes: > Hello, Katherine! I fuzzily remember this subject in maillists, maybe we > discussed this feature. And there were instruction of how to define in `guix > package -u` those packages you won't update. > Also I know guix has feature to check substitutes (`guix wea

Revisiting optional runtime dependencies

2019-07-15 Thread P
Has there been any progress on this front since 2015? There should be a way to communicate to the user the existence of optional runtime-only dependencies. For example, I installed Gajim recently and it pulled in Gnome's keyring, which is completely unncessary for me, as I already use KeepassXC

Re: Can we increase the print width/column in daemon backtraces

2019-07-15 Thread P
> Hi Pierre, > > > Quite often when packaging and iterating, the daemon produces backtraces > > on errors, which could be very useful to understand what's wrong, but > > unfortunately the output is truncated to some 80-ish column. > > Set the COLUMNS environment variable to some large value. > > --

Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!

2019-07-09 Thread P
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 6:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What do you want Guix to address in the future? Another thing that is super important: Documentation that is easier to navigate. Ideally as good or better than the Arch Wiki. #+TITLE: GNU Guix Beyond 1.0—A Road Map * ‘guix pull

Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!

2019-06-27 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, June 27, 2019 6:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What do you want Guix to address in the future? System upgrades are still incredibly slow even with a small number of packages, there definitely needs to be more build servers and a way to tell `guix p

Re: Fennel and Luarocks

2019-06-18 Thread P
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 6:28 PM, Dan Frumin wrote: > Hi Marlin! > > I am not really familiar with the Lua ecosystem, but wouldn't it be desirable > to use Guix to manage Lua package, the way it's done for e.g. Haskell > right now? > > I don't fully understand h

Re: Porting Lutris over

2019-06-18 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Here is what I had somewhere lost on my computer for lutris: (arguments `(#:tests? #f #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases (add-after 'install 'wrap-program (lambda* (#:key outputs inputs #:allow-other-keys) (let* ((out (assoc-ref ou

Re: Should font-build-system compile sfd fonts?

2019-05-03 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Brendan Tildesley writes: > I'm calling for anyone's opinion on this. Currently there are a few > fonts which more-or-less copy-paste the same code for compiling sfd > files in to ttf and otf, which requires fontforge. I wish to add another > font, but didn't want to add to this duplicati

Re: [WIP] Lightdm service

2019-04-18 Thread L p R n d n
pen! :D Have a nice day, L p R n d n

Re: [WIP] Lightdm service

2019-04-18 Thread L p R n d n
Hello again! Just sharing some logsthat might be usefull. And everything is tested in a simple vm. Thanks, L p R n d n secure Description: Binary data lightdm.log Description: Binary data seat0-greeter.log Description: Binary data

[WIP] Lightdm service

2019-04-17 Thread L p R n d n
o find Xauthority if XAUTHORITY environment variable is set. See https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/lightdm/issues/68 . But I'm not sure it's relevant her. So if anyone has a lead, please share it! :) Have a nice day, L p R n d n

Re: Status update on 1.0

2019-03-14 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:08:38PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> mikadoZero writes: >> >> >> • “GuixSD” has been removed from the web site and from almost all of >> >> the source code. Still need to fix the file names that appear in >> >>

Re: Status update on 1.0

2019-03-13 Thread L p R n d n
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:08:38PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> mikadoZero writes: >> >> >> • “GuixSD” has been removed from the web site and from almost all of >> >> the source code. Still need to fix the file names that appear in >> >> Make

Re: Guix pronunciation

2019-03-11 Thread L p R n d n
Hello mikadoZero writes: > Doing this duckduckgo site search: `geeks > site:https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/` gives me only one match. Which > is footnote 1 of section 1 Introduction of the manual. I do not know of > anywhere else where the pronunciation of Guix is explicitly stated. > > I

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-17 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, swedebugia writes: > On 2019-01-17 12:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> >> L p R n d n writes: >> >>> Guix is ... >>> >>> ... a package and system manager. (A seen previously, system manager is >>> too wide) >>> ... a packag

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-17 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Thanks for your feedbacks! George Clemmer writes: > Hi Lprndn, > > I am glad to see your interest in these issues. > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi, >> >> L p R n d n skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>

Re: GNOME 3.30: help needed!

2019-01-14 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Sorry for the delay, I had some troubles building webkitgtk. I started gnome successfully from slim on my usual computer! Good job everybody! Most things seem ok but not everything. FYI, I use a custom kernel so some errors might just be specific to my own config. This is why it could be n

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-14 Thread L p R n d n
HeLlO, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> L p R n d n writes: >> >>>>> What about guix.info? We can do whatever we want there I suppose and just >>>>> link >>>>> to it from the gnu site. >>

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-14 Thread L p R n d n
Hey, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > L p R n d n skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > >>> A very concrete task that could be of interest to you is the “name >>> change” (a bit of a strong word) that we’d like to implement by

Re: GRUB fallback mechanism [was Re: Brain storming cool Guix features]

2019-01-14 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> swedebugia writes: >> >>> Leo Famulari skrev: (11 januari 2019 23:32:12 CET) > > [...] > Apparently GRUB has a feature that records a "fallback" system to boot if booting fails. Maybe when reconfiguring, Guix could

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-10 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > L p R n d n skribis: > >> After taking some time learning Guix and trying to get some new packages >> in, I wanted get involved in a slightly different way. I'm not good at >> programming and I think my time mi

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-10 Thread L p R n d n
Hi, swedebugia writes: > "Ludovic Courtès" skrev: (8 januari 2019 18:37:53 CET) >>Hello, >> >>L p R n d n skribis: >> >>> After taking some time learning Guix and trying to get some new >>packages >>> in, I wante

Re: Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-10 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi swedebugia, > > swedebugia skribis: > By the way, I wanted to start working on the documentation. IMHO, it might benefit from a little graphical enhancement for newcomers. The thing is that it's currently hosted on gnu.org so it's probabl

Communication and Design at Guix

2019-01-08 Thread L p R n d n
Hello Guix, After taking some time learning Guix and trying to get some new packages in, I wanted get involved in a slightly different way. I'm not good at programming and I think my time might be better used participating in tasks a little more inline with my skills. The thing is that I find "des

Re: Brain storming cool Guix features

2019-01-07 Thread L p R n d n
Hellohello, Joshua Branson writes: > I had some cool ideas/features for things that GuixSD could potentially > add, and I wanted to share. Are any of these possible? > > #+BEGIN_SRC scheme > (operating system > (keymap "dvorak") > ...) > #+END_SRC > > > The above would make the bootloade

Re: GNOME 3.30: help needed!

2018-12-23 Thread L p R n d n
anager.sessionCommands = '' if test "$XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP" = "GNOME"; then ${concatMapStrings (p: '' if [ -d "${p}/share/gsettings-schemas/${p.name}" ]; then export XDG_DATA_DIRS=$XDG_DATA_DIRS''${XDG_DAT

Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released

2018-12-07 Thread L p R n d n
Congrats Guix! And thanks everyone for the good work! :) Lprndn

Re: Packaging Arcan

2018-11-26 Thread L p R n d n
Thank you! For the record, for OpenAl, I ended up adding the patched version as an input without packaging it (following the git example given by swedebugia). Then, copying the files in the right place, the build system seems to be smart enough to deal with the rest on its own. It's one less pac

Re: Packaging Arcan

2018-11-26 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Thank you for the help. I decided to package appls on their own as they are not part of Arcan itself and can be written by anyone. My plan, if I understood correctly, is to copy appls file to '%out/share/arcan/appl' as the folder already exists in Arcan package so that everything is "merged

Re: Packaging Arcan

2018-11-23 Thread L p R n d n
Thanks Pierre for your quick answer! Pierre Neidhardt writes: >> 3.a. For qemu, I fear the produced binaries would conflict with the >> original ones. Is there something we can do in the build process to deal >> with that can of thing or sould we just expect the user deal with it on >> its own

Re: Packaging Arcan

2018-11-23 Thread L p R n d n
Huummm... Hello again, Forgot something again. :/ So one last question (let's hope). Arcan load 'appl's which are basically applications written in Lua. They don't need to be built, just copied to be used as is, so they don't produce binaries. To start an appl with arcan, you need to 'arcan $

Packaging Arcan

2018-11-23 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, I started to package Arcan[1], mostly for fun and trying to learn a bit more about Guile/Guix. (maybe hoping for guile bindings too. :D) It mostly works, at least builds, but a few questions arised so here I am. I join the current WIP patch just in case. 1. Using 'guix lint', I get the sa

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-23 Thread L p R n d n
L p R n d n writes: > Hello, > > Sorry for the late answer. I can confirm it works for me too. ;) > I won't add any suggestions for now. Thorsten already did a great job. > (Replacing the Guix logo by the GuixSD one could be nice tho. To avoid > propagating terms mis

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-23 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Sorry for the late answer. I can confirm it works for me too. ;) I won't add any suggestions for now. Thorsten already did a great job. (Replacing the Guix logo by the GuixSD one could be nice tho. To avoid propagating terms misconceptions.) But I think we could already start talking abo

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-17 Thread L p R n d n
No problem. ;) Here they are: /gnu/store/xlsn612abqz25gl0bxdxdpax9z8ngaxn-module-import ├── gnu │   └── installer │   ├── connman.scm │   ├── newt │   │   ├── page.scm │   │   ├── utils.scm │   │   └── wifi.scm │   ├── steps.scm │   └── utils.scm └── guix ├── buil

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-17 Thread L p R n d n
Mathieu Othacehe writes: >> I built the disk image from the wip-newt-installer branch. > > Ok so could you run: > > guix gc -R /gnu/store/xxx-your-disk-image | grep installer > > It should return you the installer script in store > (/gnu/store/xxx-installer). Replying to this email with this file

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-17 Thread L p R n d n
Hey, I built the disk image from the wip-newt-installer branch. Lprndn

Re: Come back and graphical installer

2018-11-17 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, Tryed to test the installer this morning, like instructed in Matthieu's message but I'm getting an error. The message is cycling (showing/unshowing) so here are the last lines. "ERROR: In procedure scm-error: no code for module (gnu installer keymap)" Couldn't interact with the vm so I j

Re: First patch & hello

2018-11-15 Thread L p R n d n
Thanks to both of you for your help. I should be able to submit trivial packages on my own from now on. I finally succeeded at using ./pre-inst-env. Indeed, clarifying its documentation is super nice! The cleaned patch is submitted and I will now try investigating the non-determinism issue (and

Re: First patch & hello

2018-11-14 Thread L p R n d n
Ricardo Wurmus writes: Hi, thank you for your contribution! 1 . I put the package under fontutils.scm but maybe there's a better place for a font viewer? This seems fine to me. 2. I found there is a glib-or-gtk-build-system, I hesitated to use as Im̀ not sure what its purpose. Can someon

First patch & hello

2018-11-13 Thread L p R n d n
Hello, First, thank you very much for all the work done on Guix, it's a pleasure to use it. And also many thanks to Pierre Neidhardt for his very nice packaging tutorial, it helped me a lot. So, I wrote my first package for guix and as I'm no dev and not used to work with patches so I wanted to

RE: ~/.guix-profile/manifest usage with "guix package -m [manifest]" / "guix pack -m [manifest]" etc..

2018-10-01 Thread YOANN P
>De : George Clemmer > >>Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hello, >> >> YOANN P skribis: >> >>> I was thinking than "~/.guix-profile/manifest" was a valid manifest file >>> due to his name, but it seems not that is the case from the

RE: ~/.guix-profile/manifest usage with "guix package -m [manifest]" / "guix pack -m [manifest]" etc..

2018-09-27 Thread YOANN P
>De : Ludovic Courtès >Envoyé : mercredi 26 septembre 2018 10:19 >À : YOANN P >Cc : guix-devel@gnu.org >Objet : Re: ~/.guix-profile/manifest usage with "guix package -m [manifest]" / >"guix pack -m [manifest]" etc.. > >Hello, Hi, > >YOANN P

~/.guix-profile/manifest usage with "guix package -m [manifest]" / "guix pack -m [manifest]" etc..

2018-09-25 Thread YOANN P
Hi there, I was thinking than "~/.guix-profile/manifest" was a valid manifest file due to his name, but it seems not that is the case from the error i've got https://pastebin.com/Z7h2t5mL After some search , i've finally understand that the instantiated profile couldn't be used as source prof

RE: Questions regarding "Relocatable" option

2018-06-21 Thread YOANN P
hat user namespaces are missing on many >systems still. indeed, wasn't aware it was you though ^^ but I don't think we talked about space and build time overhead when we had this discussion. Namespace will be activate everywhere with (a lot of) time and eventually with the introduction o

Questions regarding "Relocatable" option

2018-06-19 Thread YOANN P
Hi Guix, First, thanks for making my day when i read some days ago the post about "Relocatable", what a great news and a killer feature ! Far better than my trick exposed past weeks ago to Ludovic and even better than the wrapper i had imagine to write :) When "proot" will be included in the bi

RE: Questions regarding offloading ( unprivileged setup , parallel builds )

2018-02-05 Thread YOANN P
Hi, Thanks you for yours answers :-) > > Indeed, though if you’re customizing things anyway, you could run: > > ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix --sysconfdir=/my/etc > Thanks, I missed that part sorry > > Several machines can be used at the same time, no worries. :-) > It is really nice if e

Questions regarding offloading ( unprivileged setup , parallel builds )

2018-02-03 Thread YOANN P
Hi Guix team, I didn't find any documentation describing a way to use an alternative file for the offload settings instead of the default /etc/guix/machines.scm. Did i missed something ? Is there other files that are put under /etc ? It could be problematic for users who use custom store/sta

Include Proot-static with binary releases

2018-01-17 Thread YOANN P
Hi Guix Team, Is there any plan to include "proot-static" with Guix Binary releases ? My request is motivated by the fact i'm looking for a way to use/install Guix only with the bin release on a non-privileged environnement (HPC, non root user) without the need to use guix pack on another compu

Re: [PATCH] gnu: link-grammar: New module.

2016-10-24 Thread Amir P
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:20:11 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > If sqlite and zlib are only used when building, but not when running > link-grammar, then they should be native-inputs. > > Otherwise, we will need to figure out how to make link-grammar retain > references to these libraries. The link-gramm