Re: [gnu.org #1524186] [guix] request to decommission hydra.gnu.org

2020-05-17 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
Hi Andrew, (+Cc: guix-maintainers.) "Andrew Engelbrecht via RT" skribis: > I'm Andrew, a sysadmin at the FSF. > > We recently received a request to decommission hydra.gnu.org, an old build > server that we host. I'm checking in with the Guix development community with > this email, to follow

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-02-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> [l...@gnu.org - Fri Feb 14 06:03:29 2014]: >> >> "Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> > >> > So, are we to change the source format of blurb items to HTML? if yes, >> > I'd file >> > a patch to bug-womb. >> >> I became convinced that we (Guix) could just get files from the W

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-02-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> [karl - Sat Jan 11 18:34:38 2014]: >> >> > What would you prefer? >> >> I prefer plain text, but I don't feel that strongly about it, as such. >> >> > about not introducing HTML markup in the translated text? >> >> If the "translation" you're referring to is the ho

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-01-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Karl Berry via RT" skribis: > I thought you guys didn't want these hypothetical TP translators to see > HTML. If you do, fine, we can make the original be HTML, at least as > far as the internal text goes, which is the only concern here afaik. This is really just a suggestion. What would you

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-01-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > On 01/10/2014 03:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: > >> > >> (0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www > >> translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files; > >> &g

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > I think it can be organized this way: > > (0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www > translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files; > > (1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send > a copy to the re

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > On 01/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote: >> "Ineiev via RT" skribis: >> >>> If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job >>> to commit their translations to www. >&

Re: [gnu.org #881181] Re: [gnu.org #881518] Re: Package synopses and blurbs translation

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès via RT
"Ineiev via RT" skribis: > If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job > to commit their translations to www. There would likely be duplicated work if there were both www and non www people translating these things, which is why I started this discussion. Are you